Catching-up: Belleville’s Last Three Games

I’m behind on my game breakdowns and so I’ll break format to sum things up as efficiently as possible.

Belleville 1 Manitoba 4
Shots: 24-29
PP: 0-2
PK: 3-4
Scoring chances: 3
The Goals
1. Manitoba – Flanagan stripped of the puck and Taylor is beaten five-hole
2. Manitoba PP – Taylor beat on a clean wrist-shot from the high slot
3. Manitoba – Taylor gives up a fat rebound that gets bounced in behind him
4. Manitoba – Gagne is lazy on the backcheck and the third man on the rush beats Taylor
5. SH McCormick deflects in O’Brien’s pass on a 2-on-1

Danny Taylor returned to form (in a bad way) and the BSens didn’t put up much of a fight in their loss to the Moose (season low for scoring chances). The lines were ridiculous, with Chris Kelly the first line center (again!), Tyler Randell dressed for no particular reason, and two ECHL call-ups were on the blueline (as they were for the next two games). This was the kind of game that inspires Tweets like this.

Not many notable plays: O’Brien misses the empty-net on a wrap-around (first); Gagne can’t complete a pass on a 2-on-1 (first).

Belleville 2 Syracuse 5
Shots: 24-36
PP: 1-4
PK: 6-6
Scoring chances: 7
The Goals
1. Syracuse – on a delayed penalty call the puck is tipped in
2. Syracuse – Hogberg beat low with a wrist shot unopposed in the slot
3. Syracuse – Paul turns it over, Burgdoerfer can’t handle the loose puck despite no pressure and no one takes the open man
4. PP Burgdoerfer splits the D and scores on a weak backhand through the five-hole
5. Syracuse – tipped in front during a 4-on-4
6. Burgdoerfer’s shot from the point goes in (looked like it was tipped)
7. Syracuse – BSens pull the goalie early and Gagne is stripped of the puck

Marcus Hogberg got another start and while he made some mistakes he made 31 saves and the team in front of him was defensively awful (I had him making 13 key saves–13!). Kelly was gone at this point, but there was still confusion with the lines as Reinhart and Blunden played far more than they should and DiDomenico and Perron were buried on the fourth line.

Notable plays: BSens lose a 1-on-3 in front of their net, but the Crunch miss the net (first); Paul misses the net all alone in front (first); puck squeaks through Hogberg but he bats it out of the way before it can be put in (first); Flanagan turned into a pylon, but Hogberg bails him out (first); McCormick gives up a 2-on-1 (first); Crunch pull their goalie with 3 seconds left for an offensive faceoff (first); BSens no shot on a 2-on-1 (O’Brien with the pass; second); Paul misses the net in the slot (second); Werek was hurt by a shot from his own team (hit his knee; stays in the game; second); McCormick takes a penalty one-second into a powerplay (third); Hogberg saves a goal late (this was video reviewed; third).

Belleville 3 Rochester 4 (OT)
Shots: 24-40
PP: 2-5 (includes 4-on-3 and 5-on-3)
PK: 5-7
Scoring chances: 8
The Goals
1. Syracuse – bangs in their own rebound
2. PP Paul bangs in Harpur’s rebound
3. PP Gagne with lot’s of room goes shelf
4. Rochester PP – shot from the point goes through a crowd and Taylor
5. O’Brien on a breakaway (backhand)
6. Syracuse – Rodewald puck-watching on the rush and his man bangs in a fat rebound
7. Syracuse PP – rebound gets batted in

A better game out of Taylor (36 saves), although he wasn’t thrown to the wolves the same way Hogberg was in the previous game. The team in front of him was pretty bad defensively, but a little better offensively (some of that can be attributed to slightly more intelligible lines, albeit Randell was once more in the line-up for no reason).

Notable plays: Harpur falls awkwardly into the boards and is hurt (first); Syracuse scores (first), but it’s waived off due to a high stick; Blunden tries to go one-on-one and comedy results (third).

The team is now on a four-game losing streak in which they’ve been badly outshot in three of the four games. On the plus side Filip Chlapik is back with the team which is a boon to their offensive potential.

I have thoughts about the month of January and Chris Kelly to share and I still owe you all my PK breakdown–it’s all coming in the near future.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)


Belleville’s Special Teams


I’ve been working on a detailed breakdown of the BSens PK (similar to what I did on the powerplay a month ago), but while that’s in progress I thought I’d go over the team’s player usage vs success on both special teams up to this point (if coaches are going to have any impact on a team, this is one of the most noticeable places for it–for the difficulty in understanding the impact of coaching see here).

I thought the easiest way to break the data into manageable chunks was to look at team performance month-to-month, noting the top used players (front and back) for that period and then tally it all up at the end (fewer games played skews the numbers, so I’ve put the cut off at around 45% of games played per month–a minimum of 4 in October, 6 in November, 5 in December, and 4 in January; games played is less relevant on the PK, so I’ve focused on the shift-count since it better represents actual TOI).

October (PP 4-49 (8.1), PK 39-47 (82.9))
Powerplay (by usage; games, points, on-ice for goals)
DiDomenico 4-1-1-2 (2)
Rodewald 5-0-0-0 (2)
Chlapik 8-0-2-2 (3)
Sexton 4-0-0-0 (3)
Paul 8-0-1-1 (3)
McCormick 7-0-0-0 (0)
Chabot 5-1-2-3 (3)
Jaros, 8-1-1 (3)
Lajoie 9-0-2-2 (3)
Burgdoerfer 9-1-1-2 (3)

Also getting points were Werek (two goals as the eighth most common forward) and Perron (one assist as the tenth most common forward).

Penalty Kill (on-ice for goals against)
Forwards (by usage)
Rodewald 21/5 (1)
Paul 33/8 (2)
Sexton 16/4 (1)
McCormick 27/7 (5)
O’Brien 33/9 (3)
Blunden 14/4 (0)
Englund 50/9 (3)
Sieloff 49/9 (3)
Erkamps 18/4 (1)
Burgdoerfer 37/9 (3)

Harpur didn’t play enough games to make the cut; both Jaros and Chabot also received semi-regular PK rotation

November (PP 6-50 (12.0), PK 41-54 (75.9))
White 13-0-0-0 (3)
Rodewald 7-0-0-0 (2)
Chlapik 13-1-2-3 (3)
Gagne 13-2-0-2 (2)
Paul 6-0-0-0 (1)
McCormick 13-0-3-3 (3)
Chabot 8-0-2-2 (2)
Jaros 6-0-0-0 (0)
Murray 12-0-0-0 (2)
Burgdoerfer 13-0-0-0 (2)

Other players with points are: O’Brien with two (both goals) as the eighth most used forward, Perron (an assist) as the ninth, Reinhart (a goal) as the tenth, and Lajoie (an assist), who would be the second most used, but only played three games.

Penalty Kill
McCormick 46/13 (5)
O’Brien 43/13 (2)
Paul 17/6 (1)
White 36/13 (4)
Rodewald 19/7 (4)
Perron 32/13 (6)
Sieloff 49/13 (4)
Englund 47/13 (5)
Burgdoerfer 40/13 (5)
Jaros 18/6 (5)

Kelly was also a regular forward, but didn’t hit the game threshold; no other defenseman approached the rotation frequency of these four.

December (PP 8-52 (15.3), PK 42-56 (75.0))
White 12-1-3-4 (7)
DiDomenico 10-1-1-2 (4)
Chlapik 6-1-0-1 (1)
Rodewald 12-1-0-1 (4)
McCormick 12-0-0-0 (1)
O’Brien 12-0-1-1 (2)
Murray 12-1-2-3 (5)
Jaros 7-0-2-2 (3)
Lajoie 10-0-0-0 (0)

Also getting points were Werek (two goals and an assist), Gagne (a goal), Perron (an assist), Reinhart (assist), Paul (assist), Harpur (assist), and Burgdoefer (assist). Harpur is under the game limit and Burgdoerfer’s use was so limited it’s essentially a three-horse race for this month because of forwards on the point.

Penalty Kill
Kelly 30/6 (5)
McCormick 55/12 (5)
O’Brien 52/12 (4)
Blunden 35/9 (2)
Randell 42/11 (4)
White 31/12 (1)
Perron 27/12 (4)
Burgdoerfer 61/12 (4)
Englund 49/12 (8)
Sieloff 24/6 (2)
Jaros 17/7 (4)

Harpur didn’t play enough games and no one else played enough at either position to be included.

January (PP 3-26 (11.5), PK 24-34 (70.5))
Werek 7-0-1-1 (3)
DiDomenico 9-0-2-2 (3)
Chlapik 4-0-1-1 (1)
White 5-1-0-1 (2)
Gagne 8-0-0-0 (0)
Paul 9-0-0-0 (1)
Murray 9-1-1-2 (2)
Lajoie 7-0-0-0 (0)
Jaros 9-1-0-1 (1)

Once again Harpur is below the threshold (he’s the only player who also has a point, an assist) and no other defenseman has played as forwards continue to man the point.

Penalty Kill
Kelly 22/6 (2)
Blunden 32/9 (5)
McCormick 29/9 (4)
Flanagan 21/7 (3)
O’Brien 22/9 (0)
White 11/5 (1)
Burgdoerfer 38/9 (9)
Englund 35/9 (8)
Jaros 21/9 (1)

Harpur is below the game threshold and no other defender has done more than spot-duty.

Total (PP 23-177 (12.9), PK 146-191 (76.4))*
[AHL stats gives the Sens two more PP opportunities and three less PK’s–I get my numbers from official score sheets, so these presumably represent later changes which I admittedly have not tracked down (they make no significant changes to the percentages)]
Powerplay (minimum of 19 games played)
DiDomenico 23-2-4-6 (9)
White 30-2-3-5 (12)
Chlapik 31-2-5-7 (8)
Paul 27-0-2-2 (6)
Rodewald 33-1-0-1 (9)
McCormick 41-0-3-3 (4)
Murray 36-2-3-5 (9)
Jaros 31-2-3-5 (7)
Lajoie 30-0-4-4 (5)
Burgdoerfer 43-1-2-3 (5)

Werek, who has six points, doesn’t make the cut; O’Brien, Gagne and Perron all have three points (the departed Chabot had four; Harpur, who has only played in ten games, has two).

Penalty Kill
McCormick 157/41 (19)
Blunden 81/22 (7)
O’Brien 150/41 (9)
White 78/30 (6)
Perron/Paul 88/41 (11), 58/27 (4)
Sieloff 132/28 (9)
Englund 181/42 (24)
Burgdoerfer 176/43 (21)
Jaros 80/31 (13)

Kelly, Flanagan, and Sexton would appear in the top-six, but haven’t played enough games to appear here; the hands-of-stone that is Randell is pretty close to Paul and Perron (see below); Harpur has the usual games-played issue, otherwise no other defenseman is even close.

Final Numbers and Conclusions

The points-per-game element of the above is helpful for the powerplay (the one-ice for goals numbers are, I think, of minimal value), but points per shift matters, so here are how the players produce per use (keeping in mind both the 19 game minimum and at least 1.8 shifts per game–the weird number is where things really drop off in usage):
Werek 0.081 (6/74)
DiDomenico 0.065 (6/91)
Chlapik 0.63 (7/111)
White 0.043 (5/115)
O’Brien 0.04 (3/74)
Perron 0.037 (3/80)
Gagne 0.031 (3/94)
McCormick 0.026 (3/114)
Reinhart 0.026 (2/76)
Paul 0.022 (2/88)
Blunden 0.02 (1/49)
Rodewald 0.01 (1/94)
Jaros 0.049 (5/102)
Lajoie 0.043 (4/91)
Murray 0.04 (5/123)

Let’s recall the usage order: DiDomencio, White, Chlapik, Paul, Rodewald, and McCormick–this is where coaching issues creep in. It’s only recently that Werek has become a PP regular (with Rodewald largely removed), but the steady diet of players like Blunden, Reinhart, and McCormick–veterans who simply don’t produce regularly–is frustrating when that time would be better spent developing players like Gagne and Perron. Since his return Blunden has cluttered up both special teams and while you can try and argue about his effectiveness on the PK, it’s simply not there on the powerplay. Kleinendorst takes forever to clue in to what does or doesn’t work and his compulsion to go back to what’s safe–the vets he likes–any times things aren’t going right causes the team all kinds of problems offensively.

In terms of driving the PP Chlapik has been the best forward for the team, even if the actual production isn’t the highest. Other than when he’s been on the point (where he’s not that effective), he handles the possession problems the team has. DiDomenico has been very streaky and when he’s frustrated loses effectiveness; Werek needs the right people around him to produce (he’s not a possession player)–no one else has been as consistent in producing as these three. On the blueline, while he’s streaky, Jaros is great–he has the big shot (something no one else, now that Chabot is gone, has on the roster), which means teams have to respect the shot. Murray, who I wasn’t happy with at all early in the season, has improved quite a bit, but I still think he’s far better on the second unit because of his issues entering the zone.

A final point on the PP–something I didn’t go into when I wrote about it last month–the team keeps putting forwards on the point and there’s little evidence it helps (indeed, I think it hurts). Virtually none of the forwards who play on the point produce while they are there (White was buried on the point for a long time when he returned from injury and its no coincidence that he didn’t start getting points until he was moved back to forward).

Penalty Kill
In determining the most effective penalty killer the raw goals-against totals (goals versus games) isn’t particularly useful–it’s better to look at the per-shift basis, so here’s how that works out (given both the 19 game minimum and averaging at least two shifts per game, although I’ve included a few in brackets just for the sake of context, keeping in mind how small sample size skews numbers):
O’Brien 0.06
Paul 0.068
[Sexton 0.069]

White 0.076
Blunden 0.086
Randell 0.087 (69/33 (6))
McCormick 0.121
Perron 0.125
[Kelly 0.135]
[Flanagan 0.136]

Sieloff 0.068
Burgdoerfer 0.119
[Harpur 0.121]

Englund 0.132
Jaros 0.162

The only additional player who meets the criteria is Randell, who doesn’t play the toughest part of the PK (he’s always switched in, he’s never on the ice for a faceoff), but nonetheless has adequate numbers compared to the others. What is different is the order, with O’Brian, Paul, and White clearly the most effective penalty killing forwards, but playing behind org favourite McCormick (whose numbers away from O’Brien suffer considerably) and the lumbering Blunden. On D Sieloff’s ability to protect Burgdoerfer is quite apparent, while Englund isn’t able to work the same magic for his typical partners (Jaros and Burgdoerfer), yet oddly had chemistry with Erkamps (of all people).

While Sieloff adds nothing offensively, he’s remarkably effective as a penalty killer and his loss via injury has thrown a significant monkey wrench in the team’s effectiveness (admittedly even at its best is near the bottom of the league)–they are a miserable 40-60 (66.66%) without him in the lineup. The absence of Harpur most of the season hasn’t helped either. Whether the recent experiment with Lajoie on PK mean anything remains to be seen, but I’m puzzled why they don’t use Erkamps who, in very limited duty, has been fine in that capacity (0.0645).

Kleinendorst has consistently put Perron and Jaros out on the PK despite mixed results and that seems to be gradually paying off (albeit the coach does not trust them yet–my guess is there was an edict from on high to play them on the PK). Flanagan and White have helped out Perron a lot as partners; Jaros, conversely, seems to just be improving (albeit how much remains to be seen).

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Belleville 0, Laval 4

I mentioned that in their previous game against Laval the BSens were badly outplayed, but still won. The situation remained the same in last night’s game except for the result. There’s going to be blame thrown Marcus Hogberg’s way and while some of that is deserved he made 38 saves so he could have been a lot worse too–he doesn’t score goals either. Before we get into the specifics, here are the basics (the boxscore):
Shots: 25-42
PP: 0-3
PK: 3-6 (two 5-on-3’s, getting scored on the lengthier one)
Goaltender: Hogberg got the start–he’d been pulled his last two starts as he’s the only goalie Kleinendorst has an itchy trigger finger with when it comes to pulls; while the big Swede wasn’t perfect, he actually played fairly well (nine key saves); Danny Taylor was the backup while Chris Driedger remains scratched (and you have to wonder what’s to become of him at this point) and Andrew Hammond is still in Colorado.

The Roster
Max Lajoie, who was sent head-first into the boards in the previous game, was understandably out of the lineup. Rather than make a call-up the team simply dressed thirteen forwards (an interesting decision–clearly they don’t want Cody Donaghey playing in Belleville, but perhaps the lack of a call was because Brampton was in Reading, PA–but who really knows?), bringing in the always useless Tyler Randell.

The Lines

Yes, that’s Chris Kelly slotted as the #1 center and no, the staff didn’t make a lot of adjustments once they were down by several goals. Randell, incidentally, did not rotate in as a defenseman–instead Reinhart played on the blueline, with a variety of forwards on the third line and Randell on the fourth.

Special Teams
Penalty Kill
Kelly-Blunden, McCormick-Flanagan (scored on), McCormick-Blunden (scored on), Perron-Flanagan, McCormick-O’Brien, Kelly-Flanagan, Rodewald-Randell, Kelly, McCormick (scored on),
Englund-Burgdoerfer (scored onx3), Murray-Jaros

A few observations here: scoring two goals did not move Gagne up to the top PP unit (apparently there was no sentiment to put the hot guy in a position to stay hot); I don’t think Perron on the point works–he’s far better working the half-boards on the wall as he’s not a threat to shoot from the point (Jaros or Gagne should be on the points for that purpose); Englund and Burgdoerfer played almost every PK minute (Murray-Jaros got one shift late in the game) and clearly it’s just not sustainable to do that; it was a rough night for McCormick and being on-ice for three PP’s against is an indicator of that.

The Goals
1. Laval PP – tipped in front
2. Laval – rebound bounces up in the air and it gets knocked in
3. Laval PP – McCormick decides to take no one and Laval walks in front of the net and scores
4. Laval PP – shot from the point goes in five-hole through a screen

Reading this you get the impression that the BSens struggled to keep the front of their net clear and that is correct.

Scoring chances (4): Rodewald, Reinhart, Gagne (pp), Paul (pp)

This pathetic amount of scoring chances ties them for the worst of the season (they pulled the same trick in their 5-1 loss to Toronto at the end of December). The sad thing is the only thing Kleinendorst did to drum up offence was a little more McCormick and O’Brien–the needle he’s been plunging into his arm all season that has the team at 18-22-3–maybe mix it up a little?

Notable Plays
Jaros was hurt by blocking a shot (first)–had to be helped to the training room, but actually did return for very limited action; DiDomenico missed an empty net; Murray took a dumb interference penalty (threw a body check at a guy without the puck) which turned into a goal against; Rodewald steamrolled a guy and had to fight (which did not go well for him); Blunden missed the net on a 2-on-1; great pass by Perron is wasted on Randell; O’Brien with a hilarious pass from the Laval corner that misses the entire team; Blunden lost his mind after Murray was clipped (he wasn’t hurt) and got tossed from the game leading to the first 5-on-3 against–this was followed by O’Brien throwing a bodycheck on Laval’s goaltender for another 5-on-3 against–veteran leadership it was not.

This was an ugly game with very few positives. Werek and Gagne remain marooned on the fourth line, while Kelly (who will be gone soon) is playing too much (no goals in fifteen games). Kleinendorst (like the org) is too much in love with McCormick, who struggled tonight–he’s a passionate guy, but he has skill limitations and should be used accordingly.

After posting an article on the powerplay (which I’ll update eventually) I owe one on the PK–I’m going to try to get it out this week. Otherwise let’s hope both Lajoie and Harpur get healthy and that Kelly’s departure means we can get forward lines that are a little less ridiculous. I know fans in Ottawa are excited to see guys like Filip Chlapik and Colin White play in the NHL, but I’d much rather see them get more minutes in Belleville where they can develop–Boucher’s fourth line doesn’t do anyone any good.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Belleville 2, Syracuse 1 (OT); Belleville 4, Laval 1

The BSens are coming off three straight wins for the first time this season (their last two-game streak was in November), winning in front of a rejuvenated Danny Taylor. Starting with the game against the Crunch, let’s dig into the last two games, starting with the basics (boxscore):
Shots: 25-19
PP: 0-4
PK: 2-3
Goaltender: Taylor’s second straight start and second straight win, although he didn’t have to do much in this game (six key saves; this is only the second time this season the BSens have held a team to less than 20 shots, the other time being their 5-2 win over Hershey back in October); Marcus Hogberg was the backup, while Chris Driedger was scratched and Andrew Hammond remains in Colorado.

The Roster
The only change was the insertion of Macoy Erkamps due to the injury to Ben Harpur.

The Lines

The nonsensical first line looks like a joke, but Kleinendorst largely stuck to this arrangement (until Chlapik was recalled to Ottawa mid-game), although all lines were rotated pretty evenly.

Special Teams
McCormick-O’Brien/Burgdoerfer (scored)
Penalty Kill
Kelly-Blunden (scored on), O’Brien-Flanagan, McCormick-O’Brien, White-Flanagan
Englund-Burgdoerfer (scored on)

Murray struggled a bit on the powerplay (enough to briefly be removed from the first unit); the team really did just use one defense combination on the PK.

The Goals
1. Syracuse PP – one-timer from the board sneaks through Taylor
2. O’Brien goes five-hole on a breakaway
3. McCormick keeps and shoots on a 2-on-1

Scoring chances (10): O’Brien (x2), McCormick (x2), DiDomenico (x2, pp), Murray (pp), Gagne, Paul, Blunden

Notable Plays
Jaros with a great cross-ice pass through traffic–winds up as a Blunden one-timer, but he misses the net (first); two chances on the PP are via Chlapik passes (first); Laj hits the crossbar (second); Paul with nice moves, but no shot (third)

Belleville 4, Laval 1

This was kind of a funny game in that, through most of it, the BSens were badly outplayed, but goaltending (both good and bad) determined the outcome. The basics (boxscore):
Shots: 23-37
PP: 0-3
PK: 4-4
Goaltender: Taylor got the start again and was good (six key saves); Hogberg again backed up, with Driedger scratched and Hammond in Colorado.

The Roster
Both Chlapik and Colin White were on recall, so Werek and Reinhart drew back into the lineup.

The Lines

There are some strange combinations here and not surprisingly the “fourth” line scored three of the teams four goals.

Special Teams
Penalty Kill
Kelly-Blunden, McCormick-O’Brien, Perron-Flanagan
Englund-Burgdoerfer, Lajoie-Jaros

I’m not a fan of Reinhart on the PP (his performance on it hasn’t been good) and I’d much rather have Jaros on the first PP, but the coaches have struggled to figure out the PP all season, so expectations for usage have to be kept in check. It was interesting seeing Lajoie play on the PK–normally that’s Murray’s spot (or Erkamps), so I wonder if there’s pressure from above to play him more.

The Goals
1. Gagne’s slapper goes through Werek’s screen
2. Murray floats one through a crowd (or really, over)
3. Blunden scores off a nice pass from O’Brien into the slot
4. Gagne scores a beauty top shelf
5. Laval – right after a PP they bang in a rebound

Scoring chances (11): Gagne (x3, pp), Murray (x2), Werek (x2, ppx2), Blunden, Burgdoerfer, Jaros, Rodewald

Notable Plays
Three BSens converge to hit one player leaving another open for a good opportunity against (first); Werek misses an empty net (first); Werek gets run over (first) and leaves the ice with difficulty (stays in the game); Laval hits the post (second); Kelly gets crushed (second; slow to get up; stays in the game); Lajoie is knocked head-first into the boards and stays down for a long time (third); Rodewald and Perron miss the empty net (third)

One thing of note about Chris Kelly here: according to the AHL’s PTO rules at team can only sign a player to two such contracts–if he was released for both the Spengler Cup and the Olympic squad (as opposed to loaned) the BSens would have to sign him to an actual (veteran) contract once the Olympics are over. I don’t think his loss would mean very much to the roster, but it’s food for thought.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Belleville Senators at the Forty-Game Mark


The above is probably unfair to the word “mediocre”, but I’m in a glass half full mood. Typically I do these assessments on a monthly basis (like I did in November), or in 19-game increments (the quarterly mark for the season), but because my schedule was thrown into chaos by the passing of my father now seems as good a time as any to catch up and look at where the team is as well as how things have changed over the last month and a half.

The BSens are 16-21-3, which puts them 28th in the league. This is actually a slightly better winning percentage than how they finished last season (0.43 vs 0.39), but not a point of pride and certainly not what the organisation expected when they spent money on questionable talent in the off-season. As the inaugural season in Belleville the org wanted a winning, or at least competitive, team, and they just haven’t delivered.

Speaking of that winning percentage, it has dropped from where it stood after two months of the season (10-11-1), having gone a miserable 6-10-2 since. As much as coach Kurt Kleinendorst likes to make excuses for his team (injuries and call-ups), they’ve actually lost less man-games over this period compared to the start of the season (91 due to injury and 58 on call-ups in the first two months, versus 58 and 57 since).

On special teams there have been tiny improvements on the powerplay–it remains 27th in the league, but has gone up to 13.6% from 12.5% in November (they are 10-69, or 14.5%, of late). Officially the PK has also gone up a little to 29th (to 76.6% from 75.9% in November), but my numbers have them 57-77 (74%) over this period–how this causes an increase I don’t know, but it does match the team’s overall numbers (I have them at 137-178 on the season, while the AHL has them at 134-175–we both have 41 goals against and the same overall percentages).

Other team numbers: the BSens continued to be consistently outshot (4-17-1 in games prior to this segment, 4-13-1 in it)–over the latter period they gave up 109 more shots than they took (6.05 per game) versus 127 previously (5.77 per game), with the team averaging 25.77 shots per game (versus 28.36 to start the season). As for goals per game, the team scored an anemic 39 (2.16), a huge drop from 2.77 in November (and 3.00 in October). The team has given up 76 goals (4.22) versus 77 previously (3.5).

Individual Performance (December-January)
[Arranged by points-per-game, minus empty-net points which are noted in their totals, with their relative performance increasing/decreasing noted by colour–green is increasing, red is decreasing; players with 6 games or fewer are in italics]
White 0.62 16-5-5-10 (+0.16)
Jaros 0.53 13-1-6-7 (+0.2)
Harpur 0.5 6-1-3-4 (EN) (even)
Werek 0.5 12-3-3-6 (-0.13)
DiDomenico 0.5 16-2-6-8 (-0.5)
McCormick 0.5 18-2-7-9 (+0.05)
Chlapik 0.44 9-3-1-4 (-0.13)
Murray 0.44 18-2-6-8 (+0.04)
Blunden 0.4 15-4-3-7 (EN) (+0.15)
Ciampini 0.4 5-1-1-2 (ECHL 6-1-5-6) (+0.03)
O’Brien 0.38 18-2-5-7 (-0.22)
Gagne 0.31 16-3-2-5 (-0.14)
Paul 0.3 10-2-1-3 (-0.02)
Perron 0.27 18-2-3-5 (-0.18)
Flanagan 0.25 4-0-1-1 (n/a)
Reinhart 0.25 16-2-2-4 (-0.13)
Englund 0.17 17-0-3-3 (+0.04)
Rodewald 0.16 18-1-2-3 (-0.75)
Burgdoerfer 0.16 18-1-2-3 (-0.11)
Randell 0.16 12-0-2-2 (+0.16)
Kelly 0.11 9-0-2-2 (EN) (n/a)
Lajoie 0.06 15-0-1-1 (-0.32)
Erkamps 13-0-0-0 (-0.09)
Sieloff 6-0-0-0 (-0.13)
Dunn 5-0-0-0 (ECHL 6-2-0-2) (-0.33)
Doornbosch 1-0-0-0 (n/a)
Melancon 2-0-0-0 (n/a)
Donaghey (ECHL 13-0-0-0) (n/a)

Many of these players suffered through long scoring slumps and some of the positive/negative comparisons are related to small sample size or slight changes. The biggest changes come from Rodewald, DiDomenico, Lajoie, and O’Brien (on the negative side) and Jaros and White on the positive. For context, here are the season-to-date totals (minimum 10 games played, prospects in blue, veterans in purple):

DiDomenico 0.6 20-5-8-13 6 PPP (empty-net)
Werek 0.58 31-9-10-19 6 PPP (empty-net)
White 0.55 29-8-8-16 5 PPP
Chabot 0.53 13-2-5-7 5 PPP
Chlapik 0.53 30-6-10-16 7 PPP
Harpur 0.5 10-2-4-6 2 PPP (empty-net)
O’Brien 0.5 38-9-10-19 3 PPP
McCormick 0.47 38-5-15-20 3 PPP (2 empty-net)
Rodewald 0.46 30-6-8-14 1 PPP
Jaros 0.42 28-2-10-12 5 PPP
Murray 0.42 33-5-9-14 5 PPP
Gagne 0.39 38-12-3-15 3 PPP
Ciampini 0.38 21-3-5-8
Perron 0.36 38-4-11-15 3 PPP (empty-net)
Blunden 0.36 19-4-4-8 1 PPP (empty-net)
Paul 0.33 24-2-6-8 2 PPP
Reinhart 0.32 37-7-6-13 2 PPP (empty-net)
Burgdoerfer 0.22 40-3-6-9 3 PPP
Lajoie 0.21 28-0-6-6 4 PPP
Dunn 0.21 14-0-3-3
Englund 0.15 39-0-6-6
Sieloff 0.1 28-1-2-3
Kelly 0.08 12-0-2-2 (empty-net)
Randell 0.06 32-1-2-3 (empty-net)
Erkamps 0.04 24-0-1-1

For any Nick Paul fans out there…yikes! I’m not sure he’ll ever be more than he is (an occasional call-up). This isn’t his rookie or sophomore season, this is year three of his ELC, and he just can’t put up the numbers.

On a more positive note, let’s look at a couple key players who have spent much of the season in Ottawa and see what impact they’ve had on the team when they’ve been in Belleville (Chabot and Harpur have never been in the lineup at the same time, incidentally):

Thomas Chabot 4-8-1, PP 8-63 (12.7%), PK 48-60 (80%), GF 34 (2.61), shots 381 (29.3)
Ben Harpur 7-3-0, PP 7-30 (23.3%), PK 23-32 (71.8%), GF 32 (3.2), shots 267 (26.7)

Don’t get too excited about data from the small sample size (the winning percentage for Harpur is an excellent illustration of that), but there are a few interesting nuggets here: Chabot adds more shots, as you’d expect, but his impact on the PK versus Harpur is interesting (he didn’t play much on the PK, but his presence meant the blueliners who did were kept in their role).

Finally, let’s take a look at goaltending. None of the men between the pipes have played especially well over this period, although they’ve all had their moments:
Marcus Hogberg 2-2-0 .882 3.75 (ECHL 3-2-0 .939 2.13)
Danny Taylor 1-3-0 .878 3.33
Andrew Hammond 2-4-1 .868 4.37
Chris Driedger 1-2-0 .859 4.50

These are all terrible save percentages, but the fact that they are all low indicates problems with team defense as much as issues with the goaltenders themselves.

I’ve criticized the coaching all season long, but I want to make it clear that better usage wouldn’t make the BSens a good team, it would just be a little better and prospects would get more opportunities–the latter is what’s most important in a year where the team has no chance of making the playoffs.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Belleville 4, Hartford 2

Hartford rolled into Belleville as the worst team in their own division with only marginally better numbers than the BSens. This “battle of the basement” meant a competitive and entertaining game. Before we get into the specifics, here are the basics (the boxscore):
Shots: 28-32
PP: 0-2
PK: 1-1 (five-minute major)
Goaltender: Danny Taylor was given his first start since a 3-1 loss December 20th and he put up his best performance of the season (seven key saves). Marcus Hogberg sat as the back-up while Andrew Hammond remained with Colorado and Chris Driedger was the healthy scratch. If this can drum up some interest in Taylor, whose veteran presence serves no purpose on a bottom-tier AHL roster, perhaps the Sens can move him so the prospects can play out the string and develop (neither Hammond or Taylor will be with the BSens next season, so they might as well decide what they want to do going forward–if you’re going to let Driedger go it’s far better to establish some value and trade him).

The Roster
Ethan Werek and Max Reinhart were out of the lineup from the blowout loss to Wilkes-Barre (I didn’t catch if they were scratched or hurt–with the latter at least I’m guessing hurt), creating space for Gabriel Gagne and Kyle Flanagan to slot back in.

The Lines

Kleinendorst took his veteran needle and stuck it deep in his vein for this one–it panned out and going by the usual confirmation bias that plagues the Sens’ org I think we’ll see this again next game. Anyone who thinks this result justifies the instinct needs to look at the BSens record to understand how often it has failed in general.

Special Teams
Penalty Kill
Kelly-Blunden, McCormick-O’Brien, Perron-Flanagan
Harpur-Burgdoerfer, Englund-Jaros

McCormick back on the powerplay is simply a symptom of the veteran heroin Kleinendorst was mainlining on the night. This is the first time all season the BSens have only given up a single powerplay, albeit was a five-minute major, but this is less about the team learning discipline and the vagaries of individual referees having their own standards (Darcy Burchell riding solo on the night). I intend to put up a post about the PK this season, something put on hold with my father passing away, but I’m hopeful I can get it out sooner than later.

The Goals
1. Hartford – Kelly and Harpur get confused on coverage leaving a man wide open in the slot
2. White scores off a sweet pass from Perron on a 2-on-1
3. Hartford – a tired Perron can’t keep up with his check who walks into the slot and scores
4. O’Brien bangs in Jaros’ rebound
5. Blunden deflects in McCormick’s pass
6. Blunden into an empty net

Scoring chances (9): O’Brien (x2), White, Blunden, Harpur, Jaros, Perron (pp), Gagne, McCormick (sh)

Notable Plays
Flanagan with a terrible giveaway that leads to breakaway (first); Chlapik guilty of over passing–he’s right in the slot and passes it off (second); White gets tossed for a hit from behind (second); Chlapik skates through two guys…but not the third and losses the puck (third).

Player Notes
Chris Kelly picked up his first two points of the season, but before uncorking the champagne it has to be said that one was a secondary assist and the other a helper on an empty net goal–however long he’s with the BSens he’s going to remain a drag on the offense. As for Blunden, the goals are nice, but he’d been pointless his previous six games and it’s unlikely this is a sign of regular production from him. I’m far happier with Jaros picking up a couple of points–I’m keen on him getting top PP time and this is a step in that direction. Lajoie, who I quite like, is in the midst of a terrible twelve-game pointless streak, but I think a good part of that is usage and bad luck. Speaking of pointless streaks, Gagne’s has hit eleven games–first unit PP time would help, as well as more ice-time and better linemates. Paul also continues to struggle to produce (one point in his last seven) despite favourable usage.

I haven’t talked about the guys in the ECHL in quite some time–once Hogberg was freed from Brampton and Donaghey’s season was clearly a failure I haven’t paid as much attention to it. Daniel Ciampini, who deserves to be playing with the BSens, is humming along at a point-per-game clip (6-1-5-6); Vincent Dunn is playing like Vincent Dunn (6-2-0-2); and Cody Donaghey’s struggles continue (28-2-2-4). If Ben Harpur stays in Belleville or Patrick Sieloff gets healthy I’d expect Macoy Erkamps to go down to Brampton sooner than later. It doesn’t seem like sending either Hogberg or Driedger down again is in the cards, so the ridiculous four-goalie situation will remain until someone is moved.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Belleville 2, Wilkes-Barre 6

Last week the BSens went into Wilkes-Barre and got crushed 6-0 (my discussion of that game is here), so with a much improved roster what did we get? Another lopsided loss, albeit the score is a little unfair to the team. Still, it’s a wake-up call for anyone who thought their win against the Amerks was a sign that things were changing for the team. Before the observations, the basics (the boxscore):
Shots: 21-32
PP: 1-3
PK: 3-4 (one of these was the last eight seconds of the third period)
Goaltender: Marcus Hogberg got the start, but was pulled after three goals (he made two key saves)–Danny Taylor came in as relief (four key saves; it’s the first time he’s played since a December 20th loss to Rochester). Both goalies let in weak goals, but I wouldn’t blame either for the loss per se. Chris Driedger was scratched and Andrew Hammond (coming off a win over Rochester) was on recall with Colorado.

The Goals
1. Wilkes-Barre – Hogberg beat short-side on a rush (not a great goal)
2. White bangs in McCormick’s cross-crease pass
3. Wilkes-Barre – Hogberg beat top-shelf on a clear shot (might have gone off Lajoie’s stick, but even so the shot was a long way out)
4. Wilkes-Barre – Hogberg beat high far side from the slot (this was a A+ scoring opportunity, so no fault here)
5. PP White one-times a nice feed from Chlapik
6. Wilkes-Barre – DiDomenico just doesn’t bother taking the man who beats Taylor swinging from one side of the rink to the other
7. Wilkes-Barre PP – awful goal from the the goal line (Taylor not against his post)
8. Wilkes-Barre – empty net goal

Scoring chances (9): White (x2, pp), Rodewald (x2), Chlapik (x2), Blunden, DiDomenico, McCormick

The Roster
Gagne (!) and Flanagan were out of the lineup, replaced by Chlapik and White; Erkamps was out in favour of Harpur. Sexton remains out with injury (he hasn’t played since November 4th), as is Sieloff (last played December 30th); Chabot remains in the NHL (presumably permanently); Ciampini, Dunn, and Donaghey are in the ECHL, while Randell thankfully remains a healthy scratch.

The Lines

As nice as it was for Reinhart to score in his last game, he shouldn’t be in the top-six; nor should McCormick or O’Brien (who, thanks to White, both broke pointless streaks–four and five games respectively); why Werek or Chlapik were on the third line is beyond me as both were excellent. The defense could be better, but the pairings aren’t terrible.

Special Teams
Werek-Chlapik-White/Harpur-DiDomenico (scored)
Penalty Kill
O’Brien-White, Kelly-Blunden (scored on), Perron-White, Perron-O’Brien, McCormick-O’Brien
Harpur-Burgdoerfer (scored on), Englund-Jaros

I’m not a fan of the second unit–Blunden’s footspeed issues should keep him off all special teams, while Reinhart’s production on the PP has been terrible (eg). With Gagne off the roster there aren’t a lot of other options, but they exist.

Notable Plays
White with a great blueline save on the PP (first); Perron took a crosscheck to the back of the head (first); Harpur threw a huge hit in the offensive zone (second); DiDomenico made a blind pass to the wrong team which resulted in him taking a penalty (third); Murray took a dumb neutral zone penalty that wound up as a goal against (third).

Players Notes
Hogberg: he’s good enough that he shouldn’t be giving up goals on clean shots, but the plus side is the talent is there–it’s about technique and consistency (a guy this big should not be getting beat high this often)
DiDomenico: his worst game of the season–a lot of mistakes, particularly in the third period with a poor defensive effort
Chlapik: wish he played more as he does so many things well
White: as a top-prospect he’s been underwhelming in his rookie season (he broke a five-game pointless streak tonight), but some of that is related to how he’s been used–tonight he showed what he can do if he’s properly set-up
Kelly: before we sing “Oh Canada” let’s bow our heads over his eleven game pointless streak
Paul: for a guy with good hands it’s amazing how little he accomplishes with his skills
Rodewald: nice player, but I have to wonder if the Sens are already regretting giving him that ELC–just like last season, after an early hot streak he has gone ice cold (17-1-2-3)–regressing to the mean
Blunden: I mentioned his skating and it’s no coincidence that despite a lot of ice time he’s pointless in his last six games
Perron: his fourth game without a point, but I’m not sure what he’s supposed to do playing on the fourth line with spot duty on the PK (and currently off the PP)

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)