Sens Season on the Brink

The season may already be flushed, but we’ll hold out hope as Ian Mendes (understandably) throws in the towel. The picture above doesn’t illustrate my own glee, but rather encapsulates all the warning signs prior to this season. Let us dial back the clock to July, where I was unimpressed with Dorion’s free agent efforts (MacEwen, Hamonic, and Korpisalo), the Debrincat trade (Kubalik is on-pace for the worst season of his career), and the overall drafting record beyond some top picks. It’s no surprise that the results of the Dorion regime are terrible, but the simple solution (firing D. J. Smith) has been allowed to linger like a bad fart, just the same way Dorion was left hanging as a lame duck GM. The results aren’t entirely on Smith (he didn’t pick the roster), but that’s beside the point. Just like in Edmonton, firing the coach is the simplest way to try and change a team’s fate. I’m sure Andlauer wants to wait for the road trip to end and that the writing was already on the wall. I don’t think the Penguin (er, Jacques Martin) will step in to ride out the season (he’s 71 and hasn’t coached since 2011-12), but there’s no need to be concerned with who replaces Smith at this point other than he needs to go. [My guess here was wrong as Martin is taking over–clearly on an interim basis however.]

The fundamental flaws the Sens have are nothing surprising. Their goaltending isn’t good enough; their blueline isn’t good enough; and their depth isn’t good enough. While I’m unsure if Forsberg and Korpisalo can work as an NHL tandem (unlikely), their horrible numbers are at least in part because of what’s in front of them. The top-end of the lineup is fine. People complain about the stars (their defensive play in particular), but that’s not the problem. The bottom of the lineup stinks and is underperforming; because of the cap situation there’s no easy way out of it. The smart move, trading Mathieu Joseph while his value is high, hasn’t occurred yet (and his injury complicates matters). To my mind there are 12 players on the roster who have been fine (all the obvious people you’d think of). Then we get to the horror show:
Forwards
Kubalik – hasn’t found a home in the lineup and his confidence is shot
Kelly – no complaints about the effort, but he can’t drive the play, making him too one-dimensional for the modern NHL
Chartier – he’s not an NHL player; people praise the defensive attention, but like Kelly above, that’s not enough
MacEwen – there’s been no need for one-dimensional fighters in the NHL for years (as I went over when he was signed)
Kastelic – I’ve never been a fan and, as with Chartier and Kelly above, he just isn’t talented enough
Defense
JBD – people love his compete level, but I don’t see the talent to back it up (and playing over 16 minutes a night?)
Brannstrom – why they didn’t move him in the offseason is a mystery (and over 16 minutes a night?)
Hamonic – bringing him back was a bad idea, as his game has fallen apart making him look like the player Vancouver dumped on the Sens originally

The time when you could roll out a physical fourth-line and call it a day are long past, but Dorion always had that mindset (and you see it reflected by many people who cover the team or hockey in general). The bigger problem is the blueline, where the drop off between the top-four (or, given Chabot‘s endless injury situation, cf, top-three) is catastrophic.

There’s nothing in the minors to save the team. While prospects remain, most of those with talent can’t play a depth role and aren’t valued enough around the league to make a useful trade. The Sens are also in cap hell, requiring space to sign Pinto (whose price has, at least, dropped), but they desperately need to turnover their depth.

Can they turn it around? With 56-games left in the season (almost 70% of the season) it’s possible, but not without major changes beyond Smith. The problem for Staios is that to make big changes means moving a good player, but the Sens can’t afford to do that as it simply creates new problems. The perfect world is: fire Smith, trade Joseph (to make room for Pinto and for at least one other minor move), dump anyone from the fourth-line for picks or future considerations (Kelly, Chartier, MacEwen, and Kastelic combined: 75-2-5-7), trade either Brannstrom or JBD and then shore up the blueline with a competent #5 blueliner or prospect (Kleven is a work in progress, but at least there’s potential). How easy is this to do? It’s not, although I believe there’s a healthy market for Joseph (moving him would allow Kubalik to slide up the lineup and you might as well find out if he can return to form with top-six minutes), and at least one or two of the pieces above could find homes elsewhere in the NHL.

What I wouldn’t do is make a panicked trade of top players. Ottawa’s elite talent is too thin for a move. The only argument I’d entertained is trading Chabot due to his injury problems, but you can’t make that deal without getting something good in return and that’s unlikely (although Columbus is still in the league, so one never knows). My expectation at this point is Smith will be fired when the team returns to Ottawa, but no other moves will be made at that time (Staios waiting to see how the coaching change impacts results).

This article was written by Peter Levi

BSens Through 22 Games

How time flies as the BSens are now at the 22-game mark (here are my comments on the first 10; the schedule made another 10-game segment awkward to do). We’ll start with a snapshot of the standings:

While the BSens winning percentage has barely moved, they’ve technically moved up the standings slightly (although their position via winning percentage is unchanged). The most recent segment: 5-4-3; going 4-2-0 in the division; PP 14.6% (-2.4%); PK 78.7% (-1.8%); GF 39 (+12); GA 42 (+12)–because this covers two extra games we’d expect more goals for/against, but in terms of per-game the team has gone from 2.7 to 3.25 and 3.0 to 3.5 (so both have increased unrelated to the extra games).

Game by Game
2-1 Cleveland (injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier; Sebrango)
4-6 Laval (injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier; Sebrango; in Ottawa: Sogaard, Larsson)
2-3 Manitoba (injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier; Sebrango)
1-8 Lehigh (injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier; Sebrango)
3-4 (OT) Hartford (Kleven, Larsson returned; Supryka released from PTO; PTO Orrin Centazzo; injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier, McPhee, Reinhardt; Sebrango)
2-4 Bridgeport (injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier, McPhee, Reinhardt; Sebrango)
6-3 Utica (Jarventie, Sogaard returned; Merilainen to ECHL; injured: Fizer, T. Boucher, Daoust, Saulnier, McPhee, Reinhardt; Sebrango)
2-3 Rochester (no changes)
4-2 Rochester (no changes)
5-2 Laval (Highmore, Reinhardt, Fizer back; Sogaard injured; Centazzo released; Sebrango loaned to ECHL)
5-2 Grand Rapids (Smejkal to Ottawa; Merilainen recalled)
3-4 (OT) Grand Rapids (Sogaard back from injury)

Individual Performances
I’ve marked those significantly above/below their career averages (cf, where appropriate); @=veteran, *=rookie, #AHL-contract, %=PTO, italics=drafted player. The NHL tallies are year-to-date rather than segment-related.

Forwards
Crookshank 12-7-6-13 (22-9-10-19)
@Pilon 12-5-6-11 (20-8-8-16)
%M. Boucher 12-2-7-9 (14-2-7-9)
Jarventie 6-3-4-7 (12-4-6-10) NHL: 7-0-1-1 TOI 7:31
*Smejkal 10-2-4-6 (17-3-6-9) NHL: 2-0-0-0 TOI 6:51
Sokolov 12-4-2-6 (22-6-6-12)
@Imama 10-1-4-5 (17-1-5-6)
Reinhardt 6-0-3-3 (16-2-6-8)
%Lukosevicius 11-2-1-3 (12-2-1-3)
@Currie 11-1-2-3 (18-2-4-6)
%Betts 11-0-3-3 (12-0-3-3)
*Ostapchuk 12-3-0-3 (22-5-2-7)
@Highmore 3-0-1-1 (12-2-6-8) NHL: 6-0-1-1 TOI 7:59
*#Fizer 3-0-1-1 (11-0-1-1)
%Centazzo 4-1-0-1 [no longer on the roster]
#McPhee 5-1-0-1 (12-2-0-2)
(@MacEwen 4-2-0-2) NHL: 10-0-1-1 TOI 4:45
(#Saulnier 9-1-1-2)
(Daoust 4-0-2-2)

The biggest surprise are Sokolov‘s struggles. I think he’ll snap out of it as he’s well below his career average (0.79 coming into the season, he’s at just 0.54 right now). The other notable is veteran signee Currie, whose struggles are to the point where I have to assume the team wants to move him (there were signs of a decline when he was in KHL). On the positive side, Crookshank is starting to look like the form he had when he broke into the league and M. Boucher is enjoying the most success he’s had at this level as a pro (although that’s probably not sustainable). One trivial note I want to make is that Betts has tripled his prior production last season with the BSens (however anemic that still remains).

Defense
Guenette 12-2-7-9 (22-3-14-17)
Thomson 12-2-3-5 (22-3-5-8)
*Matinpalo 12-1-2-3 (17-2-2-4) NHL 4-0-0-0 TOI 7:00
@Heatherington 12-1-2-3 (21-2-2-4)
*Kleven 6-1-1-2 (10-1-3-4) NHL 5-0-1-1 11:01
@Larsson 9-0-2-2 (18-2-2-4)
#MacKinnon 9-0-2-2 (15-0-3-3)
JBD 2-0-0-0 NHL 18-1-3-4 TOI 16:50
%Supryka 3-0-0-0 (7-0-0-0) [no longer on the roster]
Sebrango [ECHL 4-1-1-2]

Guenette has managed to maintain his hot pace and is the primary offensive driver from the blueline. Thomson is gradually moving back to his usual pace production (0.30->0.41, with 0.59 being the norm), but other than perhaps Kleven the team (as predicted) struggles to generate offense from the back end. It also looks like it will be safe to remove JBD from this list next time as he seems locked in Ottawa.

Goaltenders
Sogaard 1-0-2 (5-3-2 .922 2.51)
*Merilainen 2-3-0 [ECHL 1-1-0] (3-3-1 .901 3.41)
Mandolese 2-1-1 [ECHL 0-1-0] (2-2-1 .889 3.80)
#Sinclair [ECHL 3-4-0]

I mentioned prior to the season that Mandolese is consistently inconsistent and this persists. Merilainen experienced his first bumps as an AHL-pro, but that shouldn’t cause concern and in the ECHL he’s been by far the best goaltender. Sogaard has remained excellent and seems to be back on form after an inconsistent 2022-23.

Powerplay Production (6 goals)
Sokolov 3-1-4 (5-3-8)
Crookshank 1-2-3 (1-4-5)
Guenette 0-3-3 (1-7-8)
Jarventie 0-2-2 (1-2-3)
Smejkal 1-0-0 (2-1-3)
Ostapchuk 1-0-1
Reinhardt 0-1-1 (1-1-2)
Matinpalo 0-1-1 (1-1-2)
(Highmore 1-3-4)
(Thomson 0-2-2)
(Currie 0-1-1)
(Pilon 0-1-1)

The BSens are still figuring out their powerplay as only Guenette and Sokolov are producing consistently. Special teams in general have been poor and I feel like are among the indicators of coaching impact, but there’s still time for things to solidify and improve.

This article was written by Peter Levi