Senators News & Notes


As expected Matt Puempel lost his roster battle with Shane Prince.  I think it’s a good move both for the Senators and for Puempel himself, who needs to dominate at the AHL-level before graduating to the NHL.  He does add to an overloaded forward group in Binghamton that needs trimming, but that’s a good problem for the B-Sens to have.


Everyone outside the organisation knew signing Mark Fraser was a dumb idea and when he accidentally injured Clarke MacArthur the karma came home to roost.  The Sens are lucky that MacArthur may not miss any regular season time because of it.  Speaking of the regular season, the lineup is out and not only are we getting the comedy duo of Borowiecki-Cowen but we also have the decision to put Curtis Lazar on the second line–I’m not sure if he’s intended as a defensive conscience of the line or if Dave Cameron thinks he has untapped offensive potential.  Regardless, we’ll see how much trouble the third defensive-pairing gets the team into.  Incidentally, Travis Yost explores what happened to Bobby Ryan last season via the numbers.

6th sens

Nichols broke out his stenotape machine to break down Bryan Murray’s latest interview and I’ll echo his sentiment that Shane Prince is going to struggle in the NHL if he has to lug around the dead weight that is Chris Neil and Zack Smith (he’s admittedly kinder to Smith than I am).  Murray has (for the moment at least) finally acknowledged that Mike Hoffman is his missing top-six forward–I don’t think there’s a lot of rope for him, but at least this means in the short-term we shouldn’t see him stuck on the fourth line.  I’m not sure this is news anymore, but Ian Mendes tells us that the Sens decided to part with Robin Lehner because they think Matt O’Connor will be better.  Trevor Shackles offers some excellent reasons for Sens fans to be cautious about the team this season.


Binghamton has made some cuts and they include no surprises.  The only Sens prospects included were Troy Rutkowski and Vincent Dunn.  I expect that Alex WidemanRyan Penny, and Nick Tuzzolini will be sent down shortly.  When Michael Sdao returns to the lineup either Guillaume Lepine or Ben Harpur will also go.  Jeff Ulmer offers his thoughts on the Sens pre-season games as well as on some of the players (with his usual love of pugnacity; I agree with him wholeheartedly on Dunn).  The blueline for the B-Sens is woefully weak in terms of puck movement, which could create real problems for the team at both ends of the ice.


Cuts have been made at training camp as tryouts Danny Elser and Doug Reid were released and rookie Kyle Just was waived (I’m assuming he’s being sent to Berlin River Drivers in the FHL).  I missed some earlier cuts, as defensemen Dan Sova and Mike Kavanagh are no longer listed, as are forwards Adam Stuart and Thomas Gobeil.  Apparently in my delusion I indicated Robin Soudek and Jarret Lukin were defensemen, when both are forwards.

I’d noted that Evansville has an unusually large European contingent for an ECHL team (6; there are only 40 in the entire 28-team league) and I have to wonder how much international marketing for the franchise has to do with that–it may seem absurd, but in their press release about ECHL TV they say:

In addition to providing crystal clear sound quality, the new platform will allow the IceMen to control the broadcast and commercial breaks on-site and provide a global reach for its growing fan base. Evansville’s Training Camp roster features a large number of players from European countries and Canada and the organization has seen an increased amount of interest from those areas in recent months.

Perhaps it’s simply happy circumstance with the roster, but it’s not a bad idea for Evansville to try and broaden it’s market–there’s certainly plenty of players in European leagues capable of playing, assuming they can be convinced to cross the pond.  Oddly enough, for those interested in Internet subscriptions, it’s the same price to watch Evansville as it would be to watch Binghamton.

The bloggers who cover Evansville talked about the roster on their podcast and along with an old-fashioned desire to have more toughness in the lineup, they fear there’s not enough scoring in the lineup.


Waste of space Raffi Torres was given a 41-game suspension for concussing Jakob Silfverberg.  I’ve seen all sorts of reactions to this, but no judgement by the NHL was ever going to overcome the fact that Torres shouldn’t be in the league in the first place.


I hadn’t realized that Travis Yost was on Tumblr, but indeed he is and his post from a few weeks back on the Patrick Kane rape case is worth quoting at length:

I can’t emphasize enough, though, how little Kane’s guilt or innocence matters to the instant matter…. Specifically because it pertains to an act of domestic violence. Domestic violence prosecutions are extremely complex. In many instances the victim is extremely gun-shy about seeking justice. And for myriad reasons, may not want to testify. This isn’t, of course, my opinion. This is a well researched phenomenon that exists across the globe. Domestic violence is but a part of the reason why major sports leagues … have policy in place to impose discipline for illegal conduct or actions that appear detrimental to the league. in the NHL’s case, the CBA offers plenty of latitude to protect the brand and reputation of the business. One of these mechanisms (18-A-5) allows the NHL to send a player home with his paycheck if the league’s reputation is at harm. You might remember 18-A-5, since it was just recently used against Kings defenseman Slava Voynov in a similarly situated manner. It’s this kind of power that affords the NHL the luxury of being able to combat a societal epidemic while waiting for the criminal justice system to opine on a player’s guilt. It’s also the kind of power that affords the NHL the luxury of being able to combat a societal epidemic without infringing on elements of employment law. (…) What I immensely struggle with here is the rationale behind the NHL’s decision to not intervene. Surely it isn’t the threat of litigation, since 18-A-5 was collectively bargained and would be vigorously defended if a suit materialized. It would appear to me the NHL either believes their player is wrongfully accused in an arena where wrongful accusations are between slim and non-existent, *or* that the NHL simply doesn’t believe domestic violence to be a serious issue. It would also appear to me that the NHL prioritizes things like revenue and, uh, nothing else. Patrick Kane drives major ticket sales. Patrick Kane drives major merchandise sales. Patrick Kane was, at one point, the face of hockey in America. Slava Voynov was none of these things. He, of course, was sent home pending the outcome of his matter. *With* pay, per the terms of the CBA.

There’s nothing to really add to this, although I will say the (limited) coverage I’ve seen of Kane in the press has been pretty good (granted, I’m selective in who I read).

Travis had a much earlier post about getting rid of the draft that’s well worth reading, albeit I think the idea (which I like) has no legs whatsoever.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes


We’ve had more expected Sens cuts as newly signed Thomas Chabot was returned to the QMJHL and Nick PaulFredrik ClaessonEric O’DellZack Stortini, and Michael Kostka were all sent down to Binghamton (Mark Fraser followed the next day and Andrew Hammond‘s injury has kept Matt O’Connor with the team).  Let’s hope Bryan Murray was joking when he talked about Kostka getting a number of games with the Sens as a call-up.  Colin Greening also hit waivers, but I don’t know ihe’s going to stay in Binghamton all that long (I’m sure Murray is hoping someone claims him).  Incidentally, Michaela Schreiter offers up a season preview for the Sens.

Ottawa Senators Official NHL Headshots

Going back to Hammond, he’s apparently tweaked his groin (out for two weeks), which means the Sens did well to create some goaltending depth.  There’s not enough juice in the system to survive another injury to either Anderson or O’Connor at this point, but just Hammond is fine–all hail the Scott Greenham safety valve in Bingo.

jared cowen

Callum Fraser sums up the sideshow that was the Mark Borowiecki-Jared Cowen pairing last night:

When it was all said and done, Cowen and Borowiecki were side by side at the very bottom of the stat sheet, posting ugly possession numbers. At even strength, they both had Corsi ratings below 21 percent, Fenwick ratings below 17 percent and shot for ratings below 12 percent. … While Borowiecki took his obligatory minor penalty for the night – the Canadiens scored as he was exiting the box – Cowen looked anything but condifent with the puck and was getting beaten to the outside numerous times.

Does Callum know that Cowen is big or that Borowiecki is tough?  Er….  It’s scenarios like these, and the fact that Murray has at times wanted to get ride of Mike Hoffman and Patrick Wiercioch, that makes you wonder where his head is at.

Speaking of Murray (link above), he continued his faint praise of Cowen prior to the contest:

with his size, if he just accepts what he is, and what he is is a big, strong guy that has a little bit of a (mean) streak, can defend reasonably well and use his stick a little bit better, and then with the puck – keep it simple.

This sounds pretty desperate to me and it’s telling that “big and mean” are the main positive attributes given to the defenseman.  The AHL (and ECHL) is full of big and mean players–it’s not a difficult attribute to find.  If that’s what excites Murray then he might as well dress Michael Sdao when he’s healthy–he’d fight more than Cowen and wouldn’t require as much ice time.  As Nichols says in his comments, what’s disturbing is Murray’s insistence that he see’s no issue with a Borowiecki-Cowen pairing–we can only hope Dave Cameron is aware of the disaster and avoids it in the regular season.


Elliotte Friedman‘s 30-thoughts included this:

GM Bryan Murray unloaded on Mikael Wikstrand after the young defenceman went back to Sweden because of family concerns. I can totally understand Murray’s frustration. They are intrigued by Wikstrand’s potential and he probably would play some NHL games this year. But, when cooler heads prevail, I’d expect the Senators to try and see if there is still a future for Wikstrand in the organzation. He’s only 21. Remember that Ottawa has a long association with the agent, Todd Reynolds, through Mike Fisher, Chris Neil and Matt O’Connor. That can help.

Indeed, cooler heads should prevail and the Sens should keep lines of communication open.  It would be pointless to be petulant about his behaviour and waste a talented asset.


When you read theories and analysis there’s a lot to keep in mind: is the information provided sourced? Are the sources credible? Is quality data being used? What’s been left out (if anything)?  In many cases you can’t know all the answers to those questions, so you want other data to correlate things.  All this is pertinent in my response to Joss Weissbock’s PCS work.  I think the formula has a critical flaw in one of its criteria (of three), with its inclusion of height as a determinate factor.  Correlation does not equal causation–a self-evident truth, but just to give you an example of it at work: fans will recall that once upon a time whenever Chris Phillips scored a goal a stat would be dragged out about Ottawa’s winning percentage when he scored.  On the surface that seems pretty simple–Big Rig scores, the team wins.  If this were literally the case then Phillips would be played in all scoring situations–you’d see him on the first powerplay unit, perhaps lining up with Daniel Alfredsson, or in whatever ideal offensive arrangement you can imagine over his career–all the coach would need is just that one goal and the win would be secured.  This is obviously absurd and broadcasters used it tongue-in-cheek, but the point remains.  Besides the height problem I think using data pre-lockout (the one that ended the Dead Puck Era) is also problematic–not only did the game change in how it was played, the cap was also introduced which meant the emphasis on the draft (and therefore scouting) changed considerably–no one is nabbing Hall of Famers like Pavel Datsyuk in the sixth round anymore.


Andrew posted another lengthy blog on gender discrimination and while I wish there were far more posts about the topic, I’m disappointed that the post comes across not as a persuasive argument to bring people around to his point of view, but rather an expression of anger and frustration that would only appeal to people who already agree with him.  Other than catharsis I don’t see the point in preaching to the choir–if there were enough people who agreed already there would be no need to preach.  However, because he’s discussing an important issue that is underrepresented in regular sports journalism, his piece deserves a response.  Ostensibly he discusses the history of organised play in women’s hockey (mostly via anecdotal experience), with the central point being that women need to be allowed a more central place in the hockey world.  On its surface there’s nothing controversial or inflammatory about that–anyone with half a brain would agree and I’d love something like a functional pro women’s league to exist.  The problem is, the way Andrew discusses the issue doesn’t promote consensus or discuss a plan of action, instead it’s sprinkled with inflammatory elements that I think are counterproductive:

And yet mainstream hockey culture still actively discourages female fandom and resists cultivating spaces of inclusion.

Andrew can’t mean there are official policies that discriminate, so how is this occurring?  When harassment happens there should be an administrative response (by the team, forum, etc) or else the authorities should get involved–where that’s not happening, the specific institution has to be identified and rallied against.  If the problem is the laws themselves then political action needs to occur, but none of this is discussed in the piece.  There’s no onus on corporations to change their policies unless public pressure is significant (or laws are changed), so you need a public consensus that can’t be ignored to force the change.  I’m lost on what “spaces of inclusion” means–where are women being excluded from, and how?  When systematic exclusion occurs it’s something to report as above. What’s needed here is more explanation and examples that illustrate systematic discrimination which can lead to action.  Moving on:

Hockey’s contempt for women is seen in the NHL’s (and minor and junior leagues) atrocious handling of issues of violence against women and sexual assault. It’s illustrated plainly in hockey marketing and media.
Many men who love hockey hate what they perceive as the intrusion of women into their domain.

I’m not sure what the personification of “Hockey” implies–is it all hockey fans? Is it all hockey institutions?  The former would be ridiculous, so I assume he means the latter–he should be clearer.  Hockey leagues (and most sports leagues) are backwards in their handling of violence against women and they deserve criticism for how they handle it (as does the largely compliant media that covers them).  That said, the final comment is absurd–Andrew can have no idea what percentage of men “hate” the “intrusion” of women in hockey.  That’s the problem with using anecdotal evidence to justify your arguments–it just takes one other person to say none of their friends have had that problem and your argument goes up in smoke.  Regardless, anyone who does have an issue with women in hockey needs their head examined.  Next:

We continue to brand fandom space as male. … Hockey culture reinforces the centrality of men at the expense of women. Women exist on the fringes, the periphery, marginalized by the toxic masculinity that is pervasive in fan culture.

Who is “we”?  The next conversation I have with a hockey fan that begins with them demanding the women leave the room will be the first (I really hate broad sweeping statements that aren’t backed by evidence).  If he simply used facts to back up his statements–polling data, some articles, something, he’d make a much more persuasive argument.  As it stands, people who already agree with him will continue to do so and those that don’t won’t change their minds.

Many male fans think discrimination in the game has decreased in recent years.

I think he should write “many people”, as presuming he can speak for all women is a little ridiculous (as is assuming there’s an absolute gender line in opinions about anything).  Apparently Andrew can’t or doesn’t accept that the reason people think the situation is  improving is because there’s evidence that it has–bemusingly Andrew provides some of that evidence at the beginning of his article:

In Canada, female registration in minor and rec hockey has grown almost 1000% since the 1990-91 season

So clearly women are doing almost a 1000% better than 25 years ago.  To deny any progress serves no purpose–it just detracts from his argument–you’re far more likely to persuade people by talking about what’s changed for the better and then talking about the next step (god knows, the doom and gloom approach for those who are trying to push for climate change legislation has failed utterly–people simply tune out things that are only negative).  Finally:

Some refuse to acknowledge domestic violence and sexual assault at all.

Some people refuse to believe that the world is round (I endured a lengthy speech by a Flat Earther back in university–I wish I’d recorded it for posterity, but alas there were no iPhones back in 1996).  There are always going to be idiots, bigots, and sexists in the world–it’s not possible to enlighten everyone.  The best response to people like that is to both ignore them as well as putting policies in place that prevent people like that from having an impact on the sport (which requires enforcement).  No one not on the league’s payroll is going to seriously argue that hockey has kept up with the times–the league and their media lapdogs should be pushed harder, but the way to change that is to change public attitudes.  At any rate, that’s just my opinion–I encourage you to read the piece and form your own.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes

mark fraser

Bryan Murray made a head-scratchingly awful move today, signing discarded Toronto PTO Mark Fraser to a two-way deal so that he can be terrible for Binghamton (follow the link and look not just at his stats but his underlying analytics).  There’s nothing about this move that makes any sense at all and Fraser is simply going to use up ice time better served by anyone else–commiserations to the fans in Binghamton who will be stuck watching him fumble about in his own end.


Speaking of analytics, Joss Weissbock applies it to both Tobias Lindberg and Nick Paul where he talks among other things about Prospect Cohort Success as a method of predictive methods (interestingly, it includes height as a factor, but I’ll react fully to it below).  He thinks Paul is most likely a fourth-line player who has a slight chance of being a top-six forward (he also seems to proscribe to the cult of Corey Pronman).  As for Lindberg, he thinks he has greater potential of becoming a top-six forward, albeit the odds are still stronger that he’s a marginal player.  I have a lot of problems with Weissbock’s method, which compares players of different eras without any sort of sophistication and includes one element (height) which I think is virtually irrelevant in the post-Dead Puck Era.  It’s a surprisingly unsophisticated system, although given the lack of advanced data in junior leagues I suppose there’s not much choice (I applaud the effort, but not the specifics).


The Sens made a round of expected cuts sending the bulk of Binghamton players into Luke Richardson’s warm embrace (with the exception of Gabriel Gagne who went back to the QMJHL).  Three of the players are on waivers and the only one I’d hate to lose is Cole Schneider (the others are David Dziurzynski and Patrick Mullen), even though there’s virtually no chance anyone will claim him.


Nichols‘ offers his own early summary of the Wikstrand situation, including a couple of churlish comments by Bryan Murray that I agree come across as remarkably petty.

state of the union

Andrew offered a lengthy, two-part state of the union on WTYKY and there’s a lot there to dig through and a lot I agree with, but I specifically wanted to comment on his final point:

23. This is a liminal moment for my fandom. I don’t think I’m alone in that. The competing forces are seen in the competing forces of this piece. A new season is near and on the one side there’s jokes, concerns about my team, and questions about where the Sens fit when stacked against the competition. These are logical, acceptable, and typical things to be concerned about. It’s what fans are supposed to be preoccupied by. But then there’s the building storm, of disrespect and discrimination, of violence and sexual assault. It feels like this is going to get a whole lot worse before it gets better. But I can’t give up something I love right now and I won’t be made to go away or stop talking about it. There are many in the hockey community with a stronger resolve. This league with eventually, grudgingly, angrily submit and change.

First of all, I appreciated the vocabulary.  That aside, if Andrew thinks disrespect, discrimination, violence and sexual assault are worse in the NHL than they have been in the past then he needs to do a little research–it was much worse 10-30 years ago, although the fact that it was under reported or ignored makes that hard to appreciate.  The NHL is an old, conservative, clunky organisation that has to be bludgeoned into modern sensibilities and just like any corporation it’s far more concerned with protecting its image than doing the right thing.  For me it’s encouraging that the NHL is taking halting, plodding steps in the right direction (even if it’s just mouthing what’s expected)–of course I’d like the changes to be faster, but that’s simply not something I can expect (we still live in a world with the Washington Redskins after all).  As long as the trend is positive I remain encouraged, although I understand how easy it is to give in to cynicism.

A different part of his post:

7. Sens fans often look at the organization’s glut of replacement level NHL defenders and NHL-ready blueliners as a negative thing. Mark Borowiecki, Jared Cowen, and Chris Phillips aren’t providing anything special at the NHL level and are blocking the way of potential NHL candidates like Chris Wideman, Mikael Wikstrand, and Fredrik Claesson. The trio represent a variety of skill sets and Wideman and Wikstrand appear to have the inside track, not the least because they possess different skills (read: puck moving) than the trio currently filling out Ottawa’s bottom pairing. However, this depth also insulates the team from making decisions that aren’t in their long term interest. Thomas Chabut has dazzled since hearing his name called in the first round in June. While his skating and offensive instincts are most noticeable, he looked great with Erik Karlsson in Ottawa’s pre-season opener. However, Ottawa’s depth means it’s likely a couple years before he’s seriously got a chance at cracking the Senators’ blueline. That’s not a bad thing at all. On the contrary, the list of defenseman Ottawa has rushed to the NHL recently includes Cody Ceci and Jared Cowen, illustrating that it doesn’t always work out.

I can’t recall anyone outside of forums demanding that younger players be rushed (I certainly wouldn’t want Chabot inserted into the lineup).  The argument is that the depth players on NHL-contracts are worse than players being sent to the AHL–so it’s a question of quality, not quantity.


One of the things Hockey’s Future does that I enjoy are previews of the European leagues with looks at NHL prospects (or potential prospects) on their collective rosters.  Chapin Landvogt does Sweden it in two-parts and as the Sens have three prospects playing there (their season has already started), here’s his preview for those three teams:

Djurgarden (Andreas Englund)

Last season the team made the pre-playoffs after moving up from the Allsvenskan and almost won in the process. It was a huge step considering the team made regular use of so many younger players, many of whom were NHL draft picks. This makes Djurgarden one of the most interesting teams in Europe for fans in North America to take note of. … Things are looking bright and many pundits around see this team finishing anywhere from 5th to 10th. The fact is, though, that if their go-to players continue to produce, then there is plenty of depth and young exuberance to have this team competing well into the spring. … The defense continues to be young and beaming with NHL draftees….  Englund with a whole SHL season under his belt, is ready for more responsibility, and he will be given just that.

Englund is one of those big, physical defenseman the organisation is so fond of.  He’s the second youngest defenseman on the blueline and the can spend one additional season in the SHL before the Sens have to make a decision on signing him or not.

HV71 (Filip Ahl)

The team features a decent but underwhelming goaltending duo and a very young (albeit promising) blueline after a decent top four. There is lots of proven talent in the lineup, despite featuring many young, healthy legs. … Far too many of the teams key players played under their abilities for big parts of last season. … Ahl has much to prove this season as there were plenty of ups and downs last season. At the moment, he appears to have a fourth-line role all set up for himself in 2015-16.

Ahl is projected as a grinding power forward and is one of several young players vying for playing time on HV71 (including a pair of 17-year olds).  He can spend another two seasons in the SHL and shouldn’t be expected to put up numbers this season–just being dressed is a positive sign for him.

Linkoping (Marcus Hogberg)

This club has added a new coach and a number of new players after losing three of its four top scorers last season. Featuring a whole bunch of youth on the blueline and a goaltending duo that could really stick out this season, there is hardly any doubt that this team should safely get into the playoffs and could then make some real noise once there. … There is a strong goaltending duo featuring young starter Marcus Hogberg, who many feel may top the list amongst Swedish goalies this year. … Also, the defensive unit is full of youngsters with NHL potential, but hardly a blueline in the SHL will be this young. …  Hogberg is expected to be the starter. Hogberg was excellent last season until the playoffs rolled around. Many feel he is ready to dominate this season as a 20-year-old.

Hogberg is a big, athletic goaltender playing out his final year of eligibility before the Sens have to decide to sign him or not (there’s no chance he won’t be signed).  He’s competing for playing time with 30-year old David Rautio and I expect whoever is playing better will get the starts.  I’ve been high on Hogberg for quite some time, but the fantasy scouting community has started to come around as well.  How well he transitions to the North American game will be interesting to watch next year.

EvansvilleIceMenCHLEvansville traded for defenseman Andrew Himelson (DOB 1990 ECHL 50-6-10-16), a former NCAA grad who put up middling numbers at Clarkson who is entering his third pro season; they also re-signed forward Jordan Sims (DOB 1989 ECHL 24-2-4-6/SPHL 33-9-12-21), another former NCAA player (Connecticut) who is entering his second pro season and simply adds some depth.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes


The Saga of Mikael Wikstrand continues as he’s flown back to Sweden, with the initial reports saying it was an effort to return to his club team, but he’s subsequently Tweeted that he has a very ill family member.  Before that came out the Sens suspended him.  Pierre McGuire, incidentally (and before the reason was given) didn’t think his departure would taint him for the organisation.  This is a bizarre situation, although if the family emergency is serious enough I can’t blame him too much for not following normal procedure.  Murray, incidentally (before the illness news came out), compared Wikstrand to the situation he had with Samuel Pahlsson during his days in Anaheim.


Callum Fraser pulled a Nichols (who latter did his own typing and his thoughts are always worth reading) and jotted down Bryan Murray’s interview with Bob McKenzie where, beyond his mantra about a “top-six guy” (a “veteran guy”), he did say a couple of interesting things:

Patrick [Wiercioch] had said to me earlier “if I could play 10 or 15 games without sitting out a game, you’d find out what I am.” And we did that and we found out what he is, and sometimes you’re happy the phone call didn’t come back to make the trade.

It’s amazing to think that Murray only realized what the fanbase already knew by accident (injuries to Phillips and a coaching change that provided the opportunity)–it’s a good illustration of how much he seems to struggle with identifying talent over the past few years.  His comments on Jared Cowen were also illuminating:

I expect a good defensive defenseman. He’s 6 foot 5, he’s pretty mobile, he’s healthy now. He’s had a couple years of not very good health, hip, knee and different things. I think he’s behind the curve for his age group, but I expect he to play solid, be a matchup guy and move the puck. He doesn’t have to do anything offensively. He thinks he’s a more offensive guy than I think he is. When he buys the fact that he is what he is, big, strong and defensive, he’ll be a top four, No. 5 defenseman.

Talk about lowered expectations!  A #5 defenseman?  A top-ten pick maybe could fit into your bottom pair?  For someone who tends to have tunnel vision over his favourites this is a stark admission and a bad sign for Cowen‘s future.  The myopia Murray has is part of the reason he moved Eric Gryba (to open up playing time for Cowen), but if exhibition games are anything to go on he’s a long way removed from even being a depth player.

On Chris Wideman:

He’s a waiver guy, we’ve got to give him a little bit of an inside track because of that. We do have a couple of other younger guys that look like they need some games, but could play, as fill, nothing else. But I think Wideman is the next guy (after Cowen and Borowiecki), yes.

This is good to hear, but also a strong indication that Shane Prince (another “waiver guy”) is equally on the inside track (something also bolstered by Matt Puempel‘s recent injury).  Finally, an organisational comment:

When we do have a problem, we can fill it with somebody internally.

This is, I think, a reference to injuries and clearly does not impact his belief that he might need a top-six forward or another defenseman.

Incidentally, Ary M looks at the Sens issues with observational bias in respect to Mike Hoffman and it’s well worth reading (it dovetails off things Nichols has discussed, but it reinforces the point).


I watched Ottawa’s 5-2 win over Buffalo.  Exhibition games don’t mean much of anything, but I have a few observations regardless: Jared Cowen was slow, out of position, and bad at moving the puck (Michaela Schreiter thought he was okay); Matt Puempel was utterly invisible except for his part in the Chaisson goal; Guillaume Lepine made a lot of bad decisions.  Both goalies were good (O’Connor more so than Driedger), as were most of the prospects you’d expect to do well.  Tobias Lindberg was pretty quiet, but he wasn’t bad.  I was surprised by the play of Patrick Mullen, who looked pretty good (decisions with the puck and defensively), which runs contrary to what Binghamton fans witnessed last season.


Travis Yost talks about how score effects impact statistical data and the importance of analysts to factor it in.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes

pierre dorion

I wanted to highlight one particular snippet from The Silver Sevens media time with Pierre Dorion:

Yes we do [have an analytics person in the organisation]. We have an independent gentleman who we use. Our management side has used him and our coaches have used him as well. A lot of people publicize what they do with hockey analytics, we like to keep it all in-house. We have someone who we think is very capable of giving us really good information in terms of hockey analytics. We don’t always agree with what he’s saying, which is good because it’s a totally different perspective than what we are used to dealing with. I think it opens our eyes and it makes us think about how we do things. I think it’s a tool we use to make ourselves better.

I hadn’t heard this before and it’s a relief to know the Sens haven’t completely lost touch with what’s current in the NHL (analytics).  Given some of the players they’ve hung onto, Dorion isn’t a true believer yet, but I think in time he’ll adjust.

On the flip side we have a comment from Randy Lee (same link) that boggles the mind:

But the guys who stood out and made an impression on Bryan and the coaches were Max McCormick, Tobias Lindberg, Matt O’Connor, and Travis Ewanyk. Travis is the guy we got in the trade for Eric Gryba, he’s really feisty, he won face-offs, he was in peoples’ faces, he did a really good job. We just tell them that you have to paint a picture of who you are so management gets to know definitively what type of player you are, and those guys did that.

Maybe Lee is trying to pump the tires of a player who needs a confidence boost, but if there’s one prospect who has looked consistently bad it’s Ewanyk–he was invisible at the development camp and awful at the rookie camp.  There’s a part of me that worries Lee actually liked what he saw, but we won’t really find out until Binghamton’s season starts.

6th sens

Nichols has posted his Senators preview and there’s lot’s to glean from it.  I want to echo his point that the idea that the Sens have some sort of “momentum” from how last season ended is ridiculous (something even the drones at TSN 1200 have echoed).  I think he’s a little too kind to call Andrew Hammond‘s AHL numbers “mediocre”, but his caution is entirely appropriate.  On the more questionable side we hit a staple of his:

But because Ottawa’s system lacked safely projectable high-end talent that can crack the Senators’ roster in the next year, two or maybe even three years, it creates a situation in which the Senators need continued growth from the young players on the roster.

I’ve previously discussed how vague Nichols’ notion of high-end talent is (he thinks Mark Stone needs to develop more to be one–the same guy projected to lead the team in scoring per sixty).  There’s no obvious or immediate need at key positions except to round out the depth of talent; at least one of the current prospects will make an impact in the coming seasons.  Nichols is a smart guy, but he’s overly reliant on Hockey Prospectus writers for his opinions on prospects–if he opens himself up to other scouting sources we’ll see more nuanced thoughts.jared-cowen

In another post Nichols sites an Ottawa Citizen article talking about Jared Cowen and his injury woes and it’s worth quoting:

Cowen hasn’t felt 100 per cent since the mid-point of the 2013-14 season. Late that year, the 6-5 defenceman tore something in his abdomen, but thought he was dealing with a routine hip flexor.  As it turns out, he had damaged the external oblique muscle on his right side, hampering his ability to push with his right leg. Four months ago, he had surgery in Montreal to repair the problem.

This is something to keep in mind about his performance over that span, but as Nichols points out, this does mean that there are no excuses for him this season–he either demonstrates the potential that made him a top-ten pick or else he should be moved.

dave cameron

The Sens have already cut three players from camp as invitee Marcus Crawford was returned to junior along with Francis Perron and Filip Chlapik (no real surprise for any of them).  Dave Cameron has also split the remaining players into two squads with one clearly the intended NHL lineup plus potential callups (Shane Prince, Matt Puempel, Chris Wideman, and Michael Kostka).  This is a departure from the historical norm for the Senators, but it makes sense.


Ary M provides thoughts on the Sens opening exhibition games and has some interesting thoughts.  I can’t help but quote one of them:

The defense didn’t show well as a group, with BorowieckiHarpur faring the worst out of the three pairings. It was so much so that despite the team wanting to give WierciochCeci first pair minutes, they finished with two minutes less than BorowieckiHarpur, mainly due to how much the latter got stuck in the defensive zone for an extended period of time. They were on ice for 23 shot attempts against, which is close to how many Ottawa had the entire game.

This is nothing new for Borowiecki, but may help dampen the mild but absurd hype for Harpur over the summer.


The organisation’s limited love for Guillaume Lepine reminds me of what happened to Geoff Waugh back in the day.  For those who understandably have forgotten, Waugh was an ECHL-player (like Lepine) who made an impression as a call-up in the 06-07 season with Binghamton; he was subsequently rewarded with an AHL-contract and proceeded to be awful in the following season (the only full AHL season of his career), eventually moving over to Europe where he’s still playing.  The major difference between the two is that there’s no real requirement for Lepine to play (unlike the talent-starved Binghamton team of Waugh‘s day), so he’s unlikely to have the same impact on the team.


Evansville announced another signing, inking defenseman Michael Trebish (DOB 1989 ECHL 70-1-8-9), who spent last season with Wichita after two in the CHL.  He’s a Ferris State grad who seems to be a safe, stay-at-home player.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes

Rookie Tournament Logo-600x300-NEW_1

The rookie tournament is in the books and camp starts tomorrow.  I saw some of the former, where things went about as expected (the team finished 2-1 with no particularly surprising performances).  Afterwards Randy Lee offered praise for everyone and although Nichols see’s some substance in his comments to me it’s all too vague and positive to mean much of anything.  Luke Peristy echoes my sentiments in his comments on the rookie tournament:

I’m just going to come out and say it: I don’t see what the Sens see here. Harpur looked big, slow, and took bad penalties. He’s probably the player I have the lowest opinion of following the tournament. I’d like to see a Freddie Claesson call-up well before I see a Ben Harpur call-up.

It was not a good showing by Harpur, although for me that was expected so didn’t warrant surprise.  We were cheated of seeing Nick Paul in action (injury) or much of Mikael Wikstrand (injured in the first game, as was Buddy Robinson).  The training camp roster includes no surprises, although besides Chris Phillips we also won’t see Michael Sdao either (injury).  There are more than enough bodies to fill those spaces, although comments from the organisation that guys like Michael Kostka have a chance to make the roster are pretty ridiculous.


Speaking of making the team, the blogosphere was all abuzz because Shane Prince is waiver-eligible.  This is something I think was brought up before he was re-signed months ago, but with camp approaching the fan-discussion has heated up–you can read thoughts from Nichols and Ross A on the topic, although given that I think Tim Murray (in Buffalo) will definitely take him if he goes on waivers the odds are extremely high Prince will make the team at least to start the season (something Nichols‘ echoed today).  Given that, RIP Matt Puempel starting in Ottawa (which I think is just fine for his development).


Eldon MacDonald offers thoughts on the Sens off-season moves and then offers his own list of the Sens top-ten prospects.

I want to echo what Ryan Lambert said in a preamble for a column on Puck Daddy:

power rankings are usually three things: Bad, wrong, and boring. You typically know just as well as the authors which teams won what games against who and what it all means, so our moving the Red Wings up four spots or whatever really doesn’t tell you anything you didn’t know. Who’s hot, who’s not, who cares?

Amen to that.

Incidentally, I had no idea how big an impact The 6th Sens had on Twitter until they re-Tweeted my last post–I appreciate the love boys.


I came across words I thought I’d never see:

Ben Blood…was one of the big free agent signings after skating in Norway last season.

I suspect this will be the only time we’ll ever hear this in connection with Blood (former Corey Pronman favourite, lest we forget).  That’s for being signed in Finland, btw.


I’ve been playing EA Sports NHL 16, having skipped the previous year’s addition as they’d removed my favourite mode (GM mode).  It’s too soon to truly pass a verdict on the game (I hope Varada over at WTYKY does a review–I enjoyed his from two years ago), but I do have a few thoughts:
-the morale concept seems silly–beyond just the idea not really working in this kind of game (IMO), how it’s built-in doesn’t make a whole lot of sense either–I get boosts for things that didn’t happen (scratched players being pleased with their ice time) and can’t really see the benefits of putting any energy into it
-I wish the AI wouldn’t adjust my trade preferences once I set them, but it does so repeatedly
-speaking of trades, the AI will drub you with terrible offers over and over again unless you explicitly prevent it by narrowing your aforementioned parameters (this includes sending you the exact same offer over and over again despite rejections)
-the draft has improved, but I’m not sure if it has realistic depth yet or if it’s just a continuation of any pick beyond the third round being worthless; they’ve also (from what I can tell) removed the ability to actively invest in drafting accuracy and player development (which makes me sad)
-I think the playoff beards are funny (in a good way)
-I’ve always thought the news feed was a nice touch, but the way content for it is generated can be a little ridiculous (inexplicable things will occur like the feed declaring I was trying to move players I had no intention of moving)

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Senators News & Notes


Travis Yost looks at which defensemen do the best job of preventing opposing players from shooting in the most dangerous areas and comes up with a number of interesting tidbits:

One of the big surprises (to me anyway) in this “bad” group is New York Rangers captain Ryan McDonagh. … McDonagh has leaked quality shots against two years in a row.
Oh, and Alex Pietrangelo. We have talked about his shaky underlying numbers before. Consider this another data point against him.
Lastly, it’s impossible not to notice how many “defensive defencemen” – by reputation only – sit in this quadrant. Brooks Orpik, Girardi, Roman Polak, and Dion Phaneuf are just four of many names in this list who are oft-regarded as shutdown defenders. By the number of shots they concede from these dangerous scoring areas, the reputation appears undeserved.

More relevant to Sens fans are the players who excel (after naming Zdeno Chara, Duncan Keith, P.K. Subban, and Mark Giordano):

Ottawa’s Marc Methot is one of those guys. No defender has been better at preventing shots near the crease than Methot in the last two seasons (1.4 less than the league average, per 60), and he’s been just as adept at keeping shots out of the also dangerous slot area. Erik Karlsson gets an awful lot of credit for the dominance of Ottawa’s first pairing, but Methot is an instrumental complement. To the extent that Karlsson’s firewagon brand of hockey temporarily fails, Methot’s become the ultimate bailout package – the guy who can settle things down and cover for his partner.

I don’t think anyone is surprised that Methot has been effective, but this effective is something else.  Whether the 30-year old can remain healthy enough to put this ability on display for a full season is another question.


Nichols breaks out his blue pencil to jot down interviews with Randy Lee and Pierre Dorion, where beyond reiterating the news that Nick Paul won’t be playing in the rookie tournament (due to injury), the major points of interest were:
-Lee pumping the tires of Mikael Wikstrand: “He’s a really good puck-moving defenceman that we want to see how he transitions to the North American game. He’s a very cerebral guy. He sees the game well and I think you’re really going to like him, but it is a transition.”  Just as a reminder, he was drafted as a safe, defensive player.
-Dorion was also pumping: “if you do look at a guy like (Mikael) Wikstrand, we feel that he’s very close to the NHL at this point in time.”  He also clarified that, whether he likes it or not, he’ll stay in North America this season: “We decide where Mikael Wikstrand is going to play this year. If he doesn’t make the Ottawa Senators, he’s going to go to Binghamton.”
-There was a lot said about the absent Paul‘s potential, but given his absence from the rookie tournament I won’t quote it here (needless to say, its several paragraphs of Dorion hype)
-Dorion indicated that, between Chris Driedger and Matt O’Connor, whoever is playing better will start; he also downplayed the possibility of either playing in Evansville (Nichols, incidentally, is firmly onboard the Marcus Hogberg train now)
-Nichols says something I completely agree with: “Like the 2011 Binghamton Calder Cup win, I don’t really think about a rookie tournament as something that is a precursor for success at the parent level.”

Martin Havlat won’t be at Sens camp as he’s taking a PTO with Florida instead.


Jeff Ulmer wonders if Binghamton will have issues in net due to the relative inexperience of Matt O’Connor and Chris Driedger.  This echoes my concerns, although by re-signing Scott Greenham and the added goaltending depth in Evansville, they aren’t completely dependent on the two young prospects.

Cassie Campbell-Pascall

Andrew over at WTYKY writes a long (and I mean long) piece about the lack of women, people of colour, and LGBTQ community amongst those who cover hockey (while mentioning Cassie Campbell, one shouldn’t forget Kevin Weekes, Christine Simpson, or rinkside reporter Andi Petrillo–all at the CBC, incidentally) and while I agree wholeheartedly with the general thrust of what he’s saying (I don’t see how anyone could not), particularly in the myth of meritocracy, he dovetails at the end into something that sounds almost like a conspiracy theory:

Far too many in each group are working to keep hockey media a white, straight, cis male preserve.

There’s no secret meetings or machinations and I’m sure that’s not what Andrew meant–he’s talking about something more nuanced–but I don’t like the language and I don’t think it’s helpful.  Certainly TSN, Sportsnet, newspapers, etc–any corporate or business enterprise where people are being paid to cover the sport should have representation–but for unpaid bloggers?  People are going to involve their friends, who may or may not be a diverse group (generally not in terms of socioeconomic background, although I don’t think Andrew talked about class in the post), and I don’t have a problem with that.  Unfortunately, I don’t see the dinosaurs that cover hockey changing anything in the near future.  Hockey coverage has been conservative and generally awful for as long as I can remember and outside the CBC (which has diversity mandates), there seems very little push for that to change.  At any rate, the blog is well worth reading in its entirety and I look forward to hearing more from Andrew.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.