Alex Chiasson was drafted in 2009 (2-38), which is before I started doing my draft analysis so I don’t have scouting reports on him. Alex Guptill was not highly touted so information is sparse, but included below. There’s more on Paul although he’s not a high-ender either. All three players are big wingers, so there’s a clear desire on the part of the organisation to have size on the boards (insert your favourite Colin Greening joke). Chaisson is already in the NHL (79-13-22-35) and better analysis on him will soon be available. Here are the two prospects:
Alex Guptill 3-77/10 LW 6’3 (NCAA Michigan 31-12-13-25) Ranking: CSNA 99 RLR 159 ISS 164
Turned pro after his third year in the NCAA; this past season he was tied for third in scoring on a team lead by J. T. Compher; lead Michigan in points when playing with Jacob Trouba on the roster the previous year.
RLR: Jr. A goal scoring machine is rather one dimensional
ISS: Good offensive upside Nice mix of speed and skill Very good skater Good shot, can score Good size/solid frame Verbal – University of Michigan Protects the puck well Needs to improve defensive game
Nicholas Paul 4-101/13 LW 6’3 (OHL North Bay 67-26-20-46) Ranking: ISS 82 HP 106 CSNA 124 FC 137 RLR 142
Finished third in team scoring, making significant strides over his rookie season in the OHL (66-12-16-28).
ISS: Paul made a name for himself this year as a quality shutdown forward who shows tremendous smarts in the defensive zone. He possesses an incredibly active stick and with his tall, lanky frame he utilizes his big wingspan to get his stick on pucks. Nicholas has shown positive strides in his offensive development although his upside is primarily his defensive game, his offensive tools including shot and hands have come a long way. Will need to focus on his foot speed and stride. Size/Strength Very Good Skating Average Puck Skills Good Shot Good Hockey Sense Very Good
HP: Nicholas was selected in the 5th round of the 2011 OHL Priority Selection Draft by the Brampton Battalion out of the Mississauga Senators Minor Midget program. Nicholas continued to develop his game playing for the Mississauga Reps AAA Major Midget and got a brief and successful stint with the Mississauga Chargers of the OJHL. Nicholas went into the Battalion training camp and earned a spot on the roster. In early and especially mid-season viewings, you could always find Paul playing physical, and showing a nice pair of hands in front of the net. He was not a good skater but was always able to remain involved in the play. However, towards the end of the season, he seemed to hit a wall likely due to playing his first full season at this level of play. He became a little more perimeter oriented and he essentially got away from his strengths. He is a strong player, who has a good chance to hear his name called at the 2013 NHL Entry Draft. When he sticks to his strengths he’s an extremely effective player who plays a power game. However he needs to use the next season as an opportunity to elevate his play and show his true potential.
FC: Paul is a good-sized winger who gets around the ice efficiently. He has some solid puck skills and can be strong on the cycle. He uses his size well and has shown an ability to finish, albeit inconsistently.
RLR: Strong, skates well, & has untapped offensive potential
So there you have it–a quick peek into the assets added through trading Jason Spezza (and the disappointing Ludwig Karlsson). Paul will play in the OHL this upcoming season, while Chiasson will be on the main roster and Guptill joins the B-Sens.
This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)
10 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
eyeonthesens 
Just got back in town and caught wind of this..so Pete, is this Guptill guy going to join the B-Sens you think? Big winger, never heard of him though. Losing Karlsson is nothing, zero upscale value.
I dunno, looks like the Sens got a bad deal when all said and told.
Yes, Guptill will be with the B-Sens; as for the deal, they were always going to “lose” it in that they weren’t going to get a player of Spezza’s calibre back, but we won’t really be able to assess it for a few years depending on how Chiasson, the prospects, and the pick turn out.
Really hope the Sens scouts are seeing things in these guys that aren’t showing up in their statistics. Personally I would have preferred to get fewer assets back, but have one of those assets have a chance to be a real impact player.
I suspect Dallas didn’t want Karlsson so they had to take a prospect that the Stars didn’t want–just surmise on my part
I think this Guptill guy is going to be a gem for the organization after doing some research. Big body who can produce. Excited to see him play, either he’s another Dziurzynski that takes the body or can produce like Robinson as far as the big boys are in Binghamton.
That’s certainly the hope!
Pete did you make it out to the development camp at all? Would be very interested to hear your observations and thoughts.
Sadly no, the work schedule was not kind for getting to the camp so I’m reliant on other people’s reports from it.
[…] Scouting Reports on the Players Acquired in the Spezza Deal […]
[…] there was more substance to it. You can read scouting reports from Paul‘s draft year here and get an idea about draft success post-lockout here (a limited sample size, but a more […]