Senators News: April 28th

Daniel Alfredsson talked about his possibly retirement, “Do I have what it takes to play at a high level in this league? To go through the rigourous workouts in the summer and play an 82-game schedule? All those questions I’ve got to ask myself and then be honest with myself. From there, an answer will come.”  He had an interesting answer when asked if he thought the Sens were becoming an elite team, “I don’t know. I think we’ve taken a lot of good steps and we’ve had a lot of guys that have really improved their play and experience. There’s a lot of potential. We’ve done a good job of making sure that there is progress. The challenge is to repeat this coming back next year and be good again.”

Ian Mendes Tweets that Peter Regin is healthy again and wants to be re-signed by the Senators.  I like Regin but with his injury history have doubts that he’ll be retained (although the lack of push from Binghamton’s forwards and the failure of Bobby Butler may leave room for him).  If the Sens do let him go don’t be surprised if he joins his best friend Frans Nielsen with the Islanders.

-Mendes also reports that Winchester suffered a concussion in game four and has no idea how it happened–getting concussed from incidental contact is a bad sign and maybe Winchester (who plays a robust game) needs to think about stepping away from hockey.

Bruce Garrioch speculates that Bobby Butler‘s days are numbered and that Sergei Gonchar might be traded (the latter is hard to imagine unless Filip Kuba is retained).

-I’ve mentioned before that Bryan Murray’s trade deadline track record is poor and the Matt Gilroy addition is another example of it.  The UFA added nothing to the lineup.

Tim Murray was on The Team 1200 and unfortunately wasn’t asked about prospects or free agents.  He did say, however, that he believes David Dziurzynski has the potential to play in Ottawa’s bottom six as a power forward in the future.

Shane Prince and the Ottawa 67s have been eliminated from the playoffs, meaning the only Sens prospects remaining in the CHL playoffs are  Jean-Gabriel Pageau and Jakub Culek.

-As has been widely reported a number of Sens prospects and players are going to play in the IIHF World Championships, including Kaspars Daugavins (Latvia), Jakob Silfverberg (Sweden), and Stephane Da Costa (France).

-Here are my predictions for the second round of the playoffs.

Don Brennan thinks the 2010-11 Sens roster with Paul MacLean as the coach would be in the second round of this year’s playoffs.  It’s simply an impossible debate to have–the circumstances to create that scenario could not happen, so why speculate?  He’s also still arguing that Butler or Daugavins should have played instead of Stone and Silfverberg–its utter nonsense, but Brennan likes to put the blame somewhere and it has to be on players who aren’t his favourites.  This kind of stunted reporting is why he’s so disliked by the fan base.

Playoff Preview: Round Two

The second round of the NHL playoffs has been set (one game already in the books) and here’s my look at the match-ups.  The league can’t be very happy to have so few key markets making it into the second round, although playoff success for the Coyotes helps the books of 29 other teams.  Like most prognosticators, my predictions were a mixed bag (3 for 8).  Here’s how I did (winners in bold, my prediction in italics):
East
New York RangersOttawa – I had Ottawa in seven, as the Rangers were able to score enough to win
BostonWashington – I had the Bruins in six, but they could not overcome injuries to get through Washington’s stifling style and third-string goaltender
Florida-New Jersey – I had the Devils in five, but the Panthers (as during the regular season) were better than expected
PittsburghPhiladelphia – I had the Penguins in seven, not foreseeing how bad Marc-Andre Fleury would be
West
VancouerLos Angeles – I had the Canucks in five, expecting to Kings to struggle to score
St. Louis-San Jose – I had the Blues in five, which was spot on
PhoenixChicago – I had the Hawks in six, but terrible goaltending made that impossible
Nashville-Detroit – I had the Preds in seven, but the Wings weren’t able to push it that far

Before I get into each series, I want to reiterate the main points to remember:
1. Team’s rarely repeat Cup runs (with both Vancouver and Boston eliminated, this trend continues)
2. The Cup winner has been no lower than 8th overall in the NHL, leaving us with the Rangers, St. Louis, Nashville, and Philadelphia
3. Playoff experience is something that gets thrown around as a vital ingredient over and over again, but I’ve never seen actual data to show that it equals success (for recent Cup winners it works with Boston, but not Chicago)–if it was a vital criteria than Detroit should win the Cup every year
4. The idea that teams need to lose before they win is simply absurd–29 teams lose every year, so other than the Cup winner it’s axiomatic for everyone
5. The officiating will be awful; calls will be missed and bad calls will be made (including goals reviewed)

New York Rangers (2)-Washington (15th)
Goals For: 226 (NYR, 13th), 222 (Wsh, 15th)
Goals Against: 187 (NYR, 3rd), 230 (Wsh, 18th)
Powerplay: 16.7% (Wsh, 18th), 15.7% (NYR, 23rd)
Penalty Kill: 86.2% (NYR, 5th), 81.6% (Wsh, 21st)
Faceoffs: 50% (Wsh/NYR, 17th/18th)
5-on-5 Goals For/Against Ratio: 1.14 (NYR, 6th), 1.01 (Wsh, 13th)
Shots Against Per Game: 27.8 (NYR, 6th), 30.2 (Wsh, 16th)

Despite the Rangers owning most of the statistical categories, this is the match the Caps wanted most given their recent history (beating the Rangers and Lundqvist twice with essentially the same rosters).  Washington beat Boston which plays virtually the same game as the Rangers and I’m beginning to wonder if the Caps have a Montreal-esque run in them (ala the Habs in 2010) where mind-numbing defensive hockey knocked out superior teams.  There won’t be many goals scored here, but I wasn’t impressed by the Rangers in their series against Ottawa so I give the edge to the Caps.  Washington in seven.

Philadelphia (6th)-New Jersey (9th)
Goals For: 264 (Phi, 3rd), 228 (NJ, 11th)
Goals Against: 209 (NJ, 8th), 232 (Phi, 21st)
Powerplay: 19.7% (Phi, 6th), 17.2 (NJ, 14th)
Penalty Kill: 89.6% (NJ, 1st), 81.8% (Phi, 17th)
Faceoffs: 48.3% (Phi, 24th), 47.1% (NJ, 29th)
5-on-5 Goals For/Against Ratio: 1.13 (Phi, 7th), 0.93 (NJ, 19th)
Shots Against Per Game: 26.8 (NJ, 2nd), 28.4 (Phi, 7th)

The Flyers beat a team (Pittsburgh) which owned nearly all the statistical edges against them in dominating fashion.  I don’t think the Devils stack up against Philadelphia very well at all and Martin Brodeur just isn’t the goaltender he used to be.  The Flyers are young so the series may go for awhile, but if Philadelphia is even remotely healthy this shouldn’t last long.  Philadelphia in five.

St. Louis (3rd)-Los Angeles (13th)
Goals For: 210 (Stl, 22nd), 194 (LA, 29th)
Goals Against: 165 (Stl, 1st), 179 (LA, 2nd)
Powerplay: 17% (LA, 17th), 16.7% (Stl, 19th)
Penalty Kill: 87% (LA, 4th), 85.8% (Stl, 7th)
Faceoffs: 51.5% (LA, 7th), 50.4% (Stl, 14th)
5-on-5 Goals For/Against Ratio: 1.34 (Stl, 2nd), 0.98 (LA, 17th)
Shots Against Per Game: 26.7 (Stl, 1st), 27.4 (LA, 5th)

If your choice is watching paint dry or watching this series, pick the former.  The Kings only calling card in these playoffs is defence and goaltending and they are playing the only team which is consistently better than they were in both categories.  The teams are lead by two experienced coaches who secretly wish games could be won 0-0.  The Blues will usher out the Kings in short order.  St. Louis in five.

Nashville (5th)-Phoenix (11th)
Goals For: 237 (Nsh, 8th), 216 (Phx, 17th)
Goals Against: 204 (Phx, 7th), 210 (Nsh, 9th)
Powerplay: 21.6% (Nsh, 1st), 13.6% (Phx, 29th)
Penalty Kill: 85.5% (Phx, 8th), 83.6% (Nsh, 10th)
Faceoffs: 50.2% (Phx, 15th), 49.0% (Nsh, 22nd)
5-on-5 Goals For/Against Ratio: 1.11 (Phx, 8th), 1.05 (Nsh, 10th)
Shots Against Per Game: 30.8 (Nsh, 20th), 31.6 (Phx, 28th)

Nashville will dominate this series (don’t let game one’s result fool you, the Predators dominated that game) as they simply have a better team.  Rinne has had his one bad game and that may well be the only one the Coyotes win.  Nashville in five.

If my crystal ball is more accurate in this round then we will have a Philadelphia-Washington series for the east and a St. Louis-Nashville series in the west.  I’d give the former to the Flyers and the latter to the Predators; a healthy Philadelphia wins the Cup, while a beat-up Flyer team loses to Nashville.

Senators News: April 27th

-The Sens season is over and hockey fans whose teams haven’t advanced have virtually nothing to look forward to going in the second round except the Philadelphia series (the other three series will be variations of 1-0 and 2-1 scores with minimal scoring chances).  My preview of the round is forthcoming, as is my breakdown of the Sens playoff effort.

Daniel Alfredsson talks about last night’s loss, “It’s an empty feeling. Especially when the game goes down to the last seconds like it did. Then, all of a sudden, it’s over. It feels weird and tough. We played a hard-fought game. We played really good, at times, we made a couple of mistakes that cost us. Henrik (Lundqvist) made some big saves to keep this close. It was a hard-fought series. I thought this game kind of reflected the whole series.”  He remains cagey about his future, “I will see how I feel physically and mentally after taking some time off. This year has been unbelievable. I’ve had a lot of fun. It’s been great to be part of a great group of guys. They kept me upbeat and happy when I’m a grumpy old man. They’ve made this year very enjoyable.”

Peter Raaymakers thinks Craig Anderson was the Sens best player in the playoffs and I’m not so sure that’s the case.  He struggled in games 1 and 6, wasn’t a factor in games 2 and 4, and he lost 2 of his 3 best games.  When he was good his play didn’t spark the team, while playing poorly guaranteed a loss.  Goalies are an axiomatic factor in every game, but while Anderson was good in the post-season he was not the straw that stirred the drink for his team.

Jeremy Milks suggests that either Kaspars Daugavins or Bobby Butler should have played in place of both Mark Stone and Jakob Silfverberg in the final three games.  Yes, that’s the same Butler who hadn’t scored in his last 15 games (Februray 15th) and Daugavins who has one goal in his last 15.  I thought both rookies played well, both are larger players than the ones they replaced and both have more offensive potential, so I think the changes were the right choice.

Ian Mendes Tweets “I’ve covered the Sens for more than a decade and that was the most enjoyable season I’ve ever had on the beat.”

Don Brennan just can’t bring himself to criticise one of his favourites.  He lists the defensive lapses last night that lead to the first goal, doesn’t identify the culprit on the second goal (Spezza), and then inexplicably singles out Filip Kuba (of all people) at the bottom of his article.  Chris Phillips, who lead the team in turnovers last night (including being unable to navigate around the back of the net) goes mentioned.

The Ottawa Sun doesn’t do Matt Gilroy any favours in their picture of the game ending handshake–the deadline flop has a big smile on his face while his teammates all look devastated.

-Sens prospect Marcus Sorensen has been traded/released from his Skelleftea contract and will continue to play for Boras in the Allsvenskan.  He was disappointed that former Sens scout and Skelleftea coach Anders Forsberg didn’t give him a chance to play.  His future as a Sens prospect is up in the air as they need to offer him a contract or he becomes a UFA.

Ottawa 1, New York Rangers 2

Ottawa’s season ended tonight in a game that mirrored the entire series–close, tight-checking, and determined by goaltending.  The Sens did not put together a full sixty-minutes and it wasn’t until some late line juggling that they started to take over.  Ottawa needed Anderson to step up and he did, but they also needed production from Spezza and Michalek and that didn’t happen–the young players were fine tonight and not the reason for the result.  I thought Silfverberg struggled to start the game, but was excellent in the third period.  Gilroy was invisible, but actually played better than his defense partner (Phillips).  Despite the result it has still be a great season for Ottawa and if they did one thing it was illustrating how vulnerable the Rangers are in these playoffs.  Random thought, but if there’s one thing the CBC seems to never grow tired of its shots of Mark Messier watching the game–I have no idea why viewers would have any interest in that.  Here’s the box score.

First Period
It was a nervous start for Ottawa through their first two shifts, but the third line (NeilSmithGreening) pushed back.  Anderson made a big save on a 2-on-1.  A Turris shot deflected just wide.  Anderson got bumped and nearly gave up an empty-net goal when it wasn’t called.  Karlsson had a great chance when Girardi tipped his slap-pass towards his own goal.  Karlsson made a couple of great plays in the offensive zone.  Anderson made a great save off Gaborik in tight.  Alfredsson got in close, but the Sens couldn’t get the find the loose puck in time to get it on goal.  The PhillipsGilroy combination struggled down low.  Karlsson got drilled trying to make a play in the slot.  Spezza drew the first penalty (I feel a little sympathy for Dubinsky because similar plays were ignored in the period).  Kuba had the best chance in the first minute of the powerplay, but couldn’t get his shot through; Phillips had a great chance in the slot.  Smith had a chance late.  Overall the period was very tight and pretty even.  Silfverberg looked a little confused in limited ice time.
Second Period
The Sens got running around in their own zone to start the period.  Alfredsson had a great chance off a Spezza rebound.  Rangers opened the scoring off a Foligno turnover.  After fumbling around with a number of turnovers Spezza had a chance in close.  The Rangers added to the lead on a defensive breakdown as Spezza doesn’t back check leaving Girardi wide open in front.  The third line drew a penalty on the following shift.  The first unit couldn’t accomplish anything, although Greening and Michalek had a 2-on-1 towards the end of it (but the former couldn’t make the pass), but the second unit (Alfredsson) scored in short order.  Spezza came close to tying it off a sweet pass from Karlsson.  The teams then clogged up neutral zone, but Smith came close and Richards fired a shot over the net.  Kuba took a penalty during a scramble in the Sens zone.  Anderson made a great save just before the period ended.  Overall the Rangers controlled the period.
Third Period
The Sens kill off the rest of the powerplay, but Anderson nearly gave up a goal as he baubled a rebound.  Spezza turned it over and Anderson hds to make a stop on Gaborik.  Ottawa took a penalty shortly thereafter (Cowen), which I think was called to even up the advantages.  Michalek had a golden opportunity all alone in front short-handed (courtesy of an Alfredsson steal).  The Rangers had no chances–a credit to the PK.  Anderson made a great save on Dubinsky in close.  Anderson made a save off an accidental deflection by CowenFoligno had a great chance but couldn’t beat Lundqvist high.  By this point MacLean had put his lines in the blender, and the combination of GreeningSpezza-Silfverberg had a great shift.  Michalek had a fantastic chance when that line came out next, missing the net on another chance;  Turris had his shot right in front deflected over the net (on the same play).  The frenetic action continued with Smith just missing the backdoor play on a pass from Kuba.  With the net empty Turris tipped the puck just wide on the exact same backdoor play (also from Kuba).  Gonchar took a penalty preventing Hagelin from scoring on the empty net and the Sens aren’t able to get control for another chance on goal.  The Rangers dominated the first half of the period, Ottawa the second.

Here’s a look at the goals:
1. Rangers, Staal
Foligno turns the puck over, Cowen decides to make a hit leading to a 2-on-1 and Gonchar can’t block the pass
2. Rangers, Girardi
A 3-on-3 turns into a 4-on-3 as Spezza doesn’t back check leaving Girardi wide open
3. Alfredsson (Phillips, Gonchar) (pp)
A point shot beats Lundqvist short side

Top-performers:
Craig Anderson – he had no chance on either goal against
Erik Karlsson – was far more involved tonight in all areas of the rink
Daniel Alfredsson – the only Sen to score tonight

Players Who Struggled:
Jason Spezza – MIA when it mattered and a lazy backcheck cost them the winning goal
Milan Michalek – he was good defensively and had a number of scoring chances, but he has to bury those chances
Chris Phillips – the big rig lead the team in turnovers

Senators News: April 26th

-Paul MacLean is playing games with his lineup, although I suspect there will be few (if any) changes from Saturday unless Zenon Konopka is hurt.  Ian Mendes suspects Silfverberg will play again and Stone will only play if Konopka can’t.

-I’m not sure what to expect tonight, but simplistically it’s going to come down to goaltending.  If Anderson can be as good as Lundqvist Ottawa should win, but if he can’t, then the Rangers will win.

Paul MacLean talked about what Erik Karlsson needs to do, “We just need him to be him. When (Karlsson) skates is when he’s at his best. He hasn’t skated the way that we need him to skate. We need him to use his skill as a skater to (help create) offence. He’s a target on our team, they’re going to try to get to him physically. He has to come up with ways at counteracting that. At times, he’s done a good job.”

Michael Grange echoes my sentiments from yesterday that the Sens are playing with house money no matter what happens tonight.

-Here’s my profile of Shane Prince.

-I’m not sure what Allan Muir is smoking, but Mike Smith is not the Conn Smyth leader so far in the playoffs (he doesn’t even justify it, he simply states it).  For those wondering, Smith is third in save percentage and fifth in goals against average.

-It never ceases to amaze me that in this day and age there are fans who resort to racism to vent their frustration.  For those who haven’t heard, some Bruin fans made racist comments after Joel Ward scored the OT winner for Washington.  These sad, pathetic losers are thankfully a vanishing minority.

Prospect Profile: Shane Prince

Shane Prince (C-L, 5’10, DOB 1992, 2-61/11)
2009-10 OHL Kitchener/Ottawa 65-15-15-30 -2 45pim (ppg 0.50) 8th
2010-11 OHL Ottawa 59-25-63-88 +43 18pim (ppg 1.49) 2nd
2011-12 OHL Ottawa 57-43-47-90 +34 12pim (ppg 1.57) 2nd

The intense Prince was picked by the Senators at the end of the second round (ranked #26 by Central Scouting).  He followed up his breakout season last year with a strong campaign this year (the 67s are still in the playoffs), although he did not make the US World Junior Championship team.  He’ll likely be signed and join Binghamton in the fall.  As an undersized forward, it will be interesting to see how his game translates at the pro level.  Red Line Report was a big fan, saying, “We love everything about him – except his inability to stay healthy.  Plays much bigger than his mediocre size; edgy player who isn’t afraid to stick his nose in – very competitive and smart.  Biggest concern in his penchant for carrying the puck into traffic without regard for his body – takes some big hits to make plays but also ended up with a bum shoulder and a head/neck injury late in the season.  Has terrific speed and is an agile, elusive skater.  Makes imaginative passes at top end gear – excellent vision and playmaking skills.  Team catalyst has tremendous work ethic.  Blocks a ton of shots on the PK unit and starts dangerous rushes the other way, transitioning from defence to offence in a heartbeat.  His team was one of the OHL’s best with him in the lineup, and couldn’t win a game when he was out injured.”  ISS said, “Prince hasn’t enjoyed a lot of the same hype that fellow OHLer Ryan Strome has even while eclipsing him in the scoring column for part of the season. The reason for this is that scouts believe Prince‘s stronger supporting cast is amplifying his skill set and that without this he doesn’t project as well. Ranked much higher at CSS, however ISS scouts have not been impressed by Prince’s production away from his star teammate Tyler Toffoli. Prince is the big risk/reward!” All his skills were listed as very good except his size/strength which is “average”.  Here’s Prince being drafted and here’s a highlight package.

Senators News: April 25th

-With so many days between games journalists and bloggers are throwing everything at the wall trying to find angles and things to write about (including Mark Borowiecki going with the team to New York, even though there’s zero chance he’ll play).  Various game seven stats are being thrown around, but how the Senators (or Rangers) performed in a similar situation 10 years ago has nothing to do with either team now.  Only a few Ottawa players have been involved in a game sevens with the organisation before and that’s not indicative of how the team will perform tomorrow.  Many of the Rangers were part of the team that lost game seven against Washington in 2009, but even that’s not terribly relevant.  The stats that mean something are the Rangers inability to score at even strength and the inability for Ottawa’s elite players to produce.  The pressure remains on the Rangers, as Ottawa has already enjoyed a successful season irrespective of what happens Thursday night–for New York, anything less than a long playoff run is a failure.

Jason Spezza talked about Paul MacLean’s as a coach, “Just his general understanding from being a player, because he’s played the game. He knows the ups and downs that go with it and knows we can get frustrated at times and we know he can get frustrated. It sounds corny, but we’ve been all on the same page and together all year and I think that’s what’s made it successful for us.”  MacLean has been nothing if not blunt in his assessment of his players and it will be interesting to see what effect (if any) it has in game seven.

Milan Michalek was cleared by the league for what the Rangers thought was an attempt to kick Girardi.  The Rangers have complained throughout the series about the officiating and I’m interested to see if it’s either going to work for or against them.  Paul MacLean had a good line about the officiating, “It’s not always the referee’s fault. They’re human. They’re not going to catch everything, but you can’t continually put yourself in a position that you make them make a call and always blame them. The responsibility is on us and our players to be (more) disciplined.”

-Another correction for bobbykelly: Jim O’Brien did not make his debut this year (he played six games in 2010-11).  Bobby is also part of a chorus of Sens bloggers who have been very restrained about Jakob Silfverberg which initially surprised me–bloggers typically want highly touted prospects inserted in the lineup immediately.  I believe David Rundblad‘s inability to make an immediate impact has dampened the enthusiasm for prospects coming out of the Swedish Elite League and I wonder if Bobby Butler and Stephane Da Costa‘s seasons have done the same for NCAA free agents.  Only CHL stars like Mark Stone still receive the enthusiastic hype I remember Alexei Kaigorodov receiving back in the day.  Stone is a good player, but his skating is poor and that’s likely the main reason he did not play in game six.  To me, hype is something the organisation has to generate and what they say about a player is what indicates whether a prospect is NHL ready or not.  We’ve been told Silfverberg is an NHL player–should he be in the playoff lineup?  If Paul MacLean thinks so, then he does.

Senators News: April 24th

-It’s amazing to think that the Sens have made it to game seven while many of their top players continue to struggle (particularly Michalek and Karlsson).  I’m not sure MacLean has much choice except to keep riding his horses in the final game–if they wake up it’s clear the Rangers can’t compete with them.

Paul MacLean summed up last night’s game, “I didn’t think we played very well or consistently until the last six minutes of the game. I’d like to see us play harder.”  Spezza was benched most of the third period and the forwards on the first powerplay unit did not play during the third period powerplay.

-The NHL is looking into Milan Michalek‘s apparent kick last night.  If he kicked Girardi he should be suspended.

-A correction from my game summary last night: apparently Kreider‘s goal was Spezza‘s error, not Smith‘s (who was trying to cover for him).

Matt Puempel talks about his concussion from earlier this year, “I don’t feel anything from that (the concussion) and I don’t hesitate at all (on the ice). I don’t think it’s held me back at all.”

Stu Hackel takes a look at the upsets so far in the first round and the seeming changing of the guard among the NHL’s favourites (with Vancouver, Pittsburgh, Detroit, San Jose, and Chicago already eliminated).

-It’s funny how conventional wisdom in the hockey world says that the Western Conference is the harder conference–better teams, more difficult opponents–and yet the West was won much more easily than the East this playoff year.  With two five-game and six-game series’, rested Western teams are already set for the second round, while the East features at least two game sevens and no series that ended earlier than six games.

Ottawa 2, New York Rangers 3

Ottawa scored early in the game, but ran into penalty trouble and couldn’t recover.  It wasn’t a great game for the officials (Steve Kozari and Ottawa favourite Tim Peel), Craig Anderson, or the Sens first unit powerplay, and all will need to improve in game seven.  Silfverberg‘s debut was mixed, with good effort mixed in with turnovers.  Here’s the box score.

First Period
The Sens had good jump to start, but the main event early was Turris getting hurt blocking a shot.  Michalek had a chance in the slot, but couldn’t decide what to do with the puck and lost it.  Rangers took the first penalty and while the first unit couldn’t accomplish much, Neil scored on a deflection with the second unit.  Turris returned after the goal.  Silfverberg made a great defensive play on Dubinsky on a rush, but Carkner took a delay of game penalty on the play.  Prust took a run at Karlsson that went uncalled.  A couple of minutes later Neil and Prust fought.  Smith took a penalty late in the period, but the Sens did an excellent job killing it off.  Overall Ottawa dominated the first half of the period, while the Rangers dominated the second half.
Second Period
Rangers had some initial pressure, but the Sens quickly started to push back and swing the momentum.  Gonchar made a great play around the five minute mark that gave Michalek a scoring chance (he couldn’t beat Lundqvist five-hole).  Anderson made a great save on Richardson on the next shift.  Condra drew a penalty to put the Sens on the powerplay (Spezza had a great chance in the slot, but didn’t shoot).  Kuba made a great block on a Rangers 2-on-1 chance shorthanded and Michalek took a penalty before the penalty was over and the Rangers scored on the powerplay.  Silfverberg was called for a light shove on McDonagh to put the Rangers back on the powerplay.  The Sens killed the penalty and Alfredsson had a great chance right in front after it was over.  Kreider took a goaltender interference call, but the Rangers had the first good chance off a Spezza giveaway and the Sens wound up taking a penalty; Foligno took another right afterwards.  Anderson made a couple of decent saves on the 4-on-3, but then let in a soft goal to Richards on the 5-on-3.  Prust had a breakaway not long after and hit the post, but the Rangers scored moments later as Kreider put home a cross-ice feed.
Third Period
Turris drew an early penalty where Phillips hit the post and Turris had a great opportunity in close.  Turris took a slashing penalty afterwards, but Ottawa did a good job on the PK.  Anderson made a good save off Anisimov after a Konopka turnover and then stopped Callahan on a 2-on-1.  Gaborik took a penalty on a great shift by the Sens and Foligno had the best chance right at the end of the powerplay.  Silfverberg had a great chance with seven minutes to go, but his shot fluttered wide of the net.  Neil had a chance on the following play, but couldn’t get the puck through the crowd.  Del Zotto hit Neil in the head on the play, but there was no call.  Foligno had another chance in close on the next shift.  Spezza scored with the goalie pulled, his shot going through a huge crowd in front, but the Sens never got another chance on net following the goal.  Ottawa dominated most of the period.

Here’s a look at the goals:
1. Neil (Gonchar, Foligno) (pp)
Neil deflects Gonchar’s shot beating Lundqvist high
2. Rangers, Stepan (pp)
Deflects in a great cross-ice pass as Condra is late on the backcheck
3. Rangers, Richards (pp)
A 5-on-3 goal that Anderson should have had as the puck goes between his arm and his body
4. Rangers, Kreider
Spezza is lazy on the backcheck leaving Kreider wide open for a cross-ice feed
5. Spezza (Greening)
Fires the puck at a crowd in front and it somehow goes in (looked like Neil kicked it in, but he didn’t actually touch the puck)

Top-performers:
Filip Kuba – did yeomans work defensively
Chris Neil – scored the first goal and was a force in the game

Players Who Struggled:
Craig Anderson – he can’t let in bad goals in this series and he did

Senators News: April 23rd

-As reported everywhere Daniel Alfredsson will play tonight.  Ian Mendes Tweets that Jakob Silfverberg thinks he’s playing tonight (Paul  MacLean was cagey in confirming it), which makes me think Mark Stone and Bobby Butler will come out of the lineup (speculation on my part).

Michael Grange writes about how Jason Spezza is constantly criticised no matter what he does.  Grange points out that Spezza‘s numbers over his career are excellent and compare well with other elite players.  The whole article is worth reading and I highly recommend it.

Joy Lindsay talked to Tim Murray about Binghamton’s season.  He discussed a number of things, saying that injuries and the lack of a #1 defensemen hurt the team.  In terms of signing veterans, “I think certainly at least one veteran defenseman, and certainly one or two veteran forwards. Up front, we do have a lot of bodies, and it may be hard to get two or three vets, but certainly one top-end one would be nice, and another complementary guy would be what we’d be looking for. But you have to think that the young guys that have been there a year or two years that don’t make our team next year, at some point you’ve got to consider them vets. I don’t think playing in the league seven years is the criteria for being a veteran. I think that after you’ve played 100 games in that league and were somewhat successful on an individual basis, we should be able to count on good, important minutes from those players.”  When talking about the development of players he singled out Mike Hoffman and David Dziurzynski and implied Andre Petersson and Stephane Da Costa would be back in Binghamton next year.

-Apparently season series sometimes do mean something, at least in the case of Pittsburgh-Philadelphia.  Despite holding all the overall statistical advantages the Penguins were no match for the Flyers.  As I mentioned in my prediction (an incorrect prediction, as with almost everyone else I picked Pittsburgh), I’m not a fan of Marc-Andre Fleury and he set a record for the worst save percentage (.834) for playoff goalies who played at least six games.  The teams combined for 56 goals (30 for the Flyers, 26 for Pittsburgh), which is vintage 1980s hockey and has to scare the hell out of whoever faces the Flyers in the second round.  Only two games were close (games one and five) with the rest being blowouts.