Future Considerations 2012 NHL draft guide is out and here’s a look at their top-30 rankings along with my thoughts about the publication:
1). RW Nail Yakupov, Sarnia, OHL, 5-10.5, 189
2). C Alex Galchenyuk, Sarnia, OHL, 6-1, 185
3). D Ryan Murray, Everett, WHL, 6-0.5, 200
4). C Mikhail Grigorenko, Quebec, QMJHL, 6-3, 200
5). LW Filip Forsberg, Leksand, Swe., 6-2, 180
6). D Jacob Trouba, USNTDP U18, USHL, 6-2, 195
7). D Griffin Reinhart, Edmonton, WHL, 6-4, 205
8). RW Teuvo Teravainen, Jokerit Jr., Fin Jr., 5-11, 165
9). D Morgan Rielly, Moose Jaw, WHL, 5-11.5, 190
10). D Mathew Dumba, Red Deer, WHL, 5-11.5, 180
11). D Cody Ceci, Ottawa, OHL, 6-2.5, 210
12). RW Sebastian Collberg, Frolunda Jr., Swe Jr., 5-11, 175
13). C Radek Faksa, Kitchener, OHL, 6-3, 200
14). D Derrick Pouliot, Portland, WHL, 5-11, 185
15). D Hampus Lindholm, Rogle Jr., Swe Jr. 6-2, 195
16). RW Colton Sissons, Kelowna, WHL, 6-1, 190
17). LW Nicolas Kerdiles, USNTDP U18, USHL, 6-1.5, 200
18). C Brendan Gaunce, Belleville, OHL, 6-2, 215
19). C Zemgus Girgensons, Dubuque, USHL, 6-1.5, 200
20). C Tomas Hertl, Slavia Praha, Czech Rep, 6-2, 195
21). G Andrei Vasilevski, Ufa, MHL, 6’-3.5”, 205
22). LW Pontus Aberg, Djurgarden, SEL., 5-11, 195
23). D Slater Koekkoek, Peterborough, OHL, 6-2, 185
24). D Ludvig Bystrom, Modo Jr., Swe Jr., 6-1, 205
25). G Oscar Dansk, Brynas Jr., Swe Jr., 6-2.5, 185
26). D Matt Finn, Guelph, OHL, 6-0, 195
27). D Olli Maatta, London, OHL, 6-1.5, 190
28). D Dalton Thrower, Saskatoon, WHL, 5-11.5, 190
29). G Malcolm Subban, Belleville, OHL, 6-1, 188
30). RW Tom Wilson, Plymouth, OHL, 6-4, 205
In FC’s mock draft they have Ottawa selecting Hampus Lindholm in the first round, saying “A nice cupboard full of forward talent from the past three drafts means the semi-rebuild will be a quick one. They need to focus now on acquiring some impact defensemen with their first rounder and possibly their second rounder in this draft. They go back to Sweden where they have experienced success and grab Lindholm with this pick.” They list Ottawa’s needs as “A couple puck moving defensemen and goaltender depth.” I agree wholeheartedly about the organisational need, although I expect the Sens will take the best player available.
Unlike the ISS guide there’s no examination of team depth, but they include goaltenders in their general listings (unlike ISS or Central Scouting) and for an inexpensive product Future Considerations is a solid purchase. In terms of predictive success, last year FC was at the bottom of publications in terms of the percentage of listed players selected (44%, tied with Red Line Report), but was tied for first (again with RLR) for the most specific selections (player X at position X).
6 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
[…] Future Considerations 2012 NHL Draft Guide […]
[…] that I’ve looked at, here are the links: International Scouting Service (ISS) Red Line Report Future Considerations Hockey Prospects Mckeen’s The Hockey News Hockey Prospectus Share this:TwitterFacebookLike […]
[…] those who predicted the entire draft): EOTS 160/211 (75.8%) RLR 156/211 (73.9%) HP 152/211 (72.0%) FC 150/211 (71.1%) ISS 146/220 (70.4%) (ISS’ picks can’t be cut down to 211 because of […]
[…] a look at their top-30 rankings and my thoughts about the publication (for last year’s go here; for their predictive accuracy go […]
[…] top-30 rankings and my thoughts about the publication (for the last two year’s go here and here). In terms of accuracy here are their last three years (compared to ISS, Red Line Report, and […]
[…] guide I consider the best value for draft fans (for previous reviews go here, here and here). Unlike Red Line Report or ISS, Future Considerations‘ is a guide made for fans. In […]